The Real Red Nation

Jenson Hagen


For some reason this pictures seems all too fitting.  Red signifies job losses.  Not so much blue in Oregon.

Vanishing Employment Map  

April 15, 2009 | Jenson Hagen | 10 comments

Comments

  • (Show?)

    Hey - how about sharing a link to your source, so that we can play with the green play button or the mouseover data.

    Reply
  • Daniel (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Um, don't we have 12.1% unemployment which is in the top three in the nation?

    Reply
  • geoffludt (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Wow, clearly the places that are the most populated have lost the most jobs. Interesting how places that have historically placed barriers to business investment (higher relative taxes), have been hit the hardest.

    Reply
  • (Show?)

    Daniel - yes. But we are a relatively lowly populated region and the map is keyed on population.

    A village of 100 people with a 50% unemployment rate would be an astounding rate. But compared to a city of 2 million with a 10% unemployment rate the village would pale in comparison. Thus the map we see above.

    Reply
  • (Show?)

    Here's the original map. It can take a minute to load properly. http://www.slate.com/id/2216238/

    If people want more statistics on local unemployment, then here is the Bureau of Labor Statistics link. http://www.bls.gov/lau/home.htm

    Reply
  • Kurt Chapman (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Here is what I see on the map:

    1. the eastern Financial Corridor gutted
    2. The Rust Belt (OH, MI, PA, IL, IN) again hit hard in heavy manufacturing
    3. Destination travel hit hard (FL)
    4. Mills and non-union manufacturing centers in the SE hit
    5. The one state seriously running close to chapter 13, CA is a victim once again of itself.
    Reply
  • Vincent (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Subtract the manufacturing areas (which have been unemployment trouble-spots for decades) and what you're looking at is a map of the burst of the housing bubble, especially in Florida and California.

    Much of the (sporadic) job growth seems to be in the South and in the Mississippi watershed.

    Reply
  • Vincent (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I'd assume much of Nevada looks pretty "red", too, but it's covered by the Los Angeles caption bubble.

    Reply
  • Steve (unverified)
    (Show?)

    "Subtract the manufacturing areas (which have been unemployment trouble-spots for decades"

    And Oregon now.

    Reply
  • Vincent (unverified)
    (Show?)

    According to this map, at least, Oregon doesn't appear to be terribly hard-hit, though the I5 corridor shows up faintly.

    Of course the problem with this map is that it appears to be counting raw numbers of jobs lost. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of cartography will tell you than this isn't really an optimal way of symbolizing this kind of data, at least out of context. This means, as noted above, Oregon's rather high unemployment rate doesn't show up very strongly.

    A more standard choropleth map to go along with this one would be much more informative in conveying which parts of the country are the most hard-hit.

    Reply

Post a Comment

our sponsors


Ad Networks