Doubletalk from Gordon Smith, again.

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

It's becoming almost a weekly refrain. Gordon Smith says one thing, and then does another. He plays moderate on TV, then votes right-wing wacko when he thinks no one is looking.

Well, Gordon, we are watching you.

Here's what happened... Senator Ron Wyden and Senator Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) offered up an amendment to the budget package that would have required the feds to negotiate wholesale deals with prescription drug companies. Wyden:

"What the federal government would be doing — unless the Congress steps in — is pretty much like somebody going to Costco and buying toilet paper one roll at a time," Wyden said on the Senate floor. "The federal government isn't using its bargaining power to hold down the costs of medicine. At a time when prescriptions are one of the fastest-growing forces in American health care, that just defies common sense."

Gordon Smith says he favors the change, but then he voted against it.

Spokesman Chris Matthews said Smith shared Wyden's concerns about drug prices, but opposed the amendment because he was concerned it could have helped prevent the underlying bill from passing.

And here's the best part:

Matthews said Smith, a leading GOP moderate, "had committed (to Senate leaders) to basically supporting the (overall) bill without any major changes."

That's right: Gordon Smith is ignoring his constituents AND his conscience - and is doing the bidding of the right-wing leadership. (Which, btw, is run by hospital industry scion Bill Frist.)

(Oh, and note the description: "Leading GOP Moderate". Seriously, when is the press going to give it up? He's not. And never was.)

Update: It's been brought to my attention that Senator Smith's claim that he only voted against Wyden's bill because he didn't want to undermine his Medicaid deal is, well, a wee little fib. He voted against Wyden's proposal on a straight up-or-down voteback in March.

  • Tenskwatawa (unverified)
    (Show?)
    <h1></h1>

    There might be a political lesson for Senator Simth in today's events, when the mayoral race in NYC is between a candidate who spent $100 million campaigning for himself and a candidate who spent $10 million. This comparison roughly parallels Portland's latest mayorality, a grossly out-of-balance moneymanic match-up, Potter set over against Francesconi.

    The low-money, high-civic respect candidate wins.

    A politico's bankroll is b.s. when voters opt for respect of civic sensibility and sensitivity, respect by civic institutions and the institution of civic respect, and respect for 'them' the voters from the candidate to them, in their regard and account. Voters respect is the account Simth is overdrawn, bouncing checks, and socialistically bankrupt in.

    <h1></h1>
  • Tenskwatawa (unverified)
    (Show?)
    <h1></h1>

    Hey, the traitorously corrupted NY Times claims the traitorously corrupted Bloomberg bought more votes. Go figure. Political lesson on me, Simth's kind of corrupt immorals and complicity in war crimes is par for the course. And his class.

    <h1></h1>
  • ForkedTongue (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Remember the SMITH billboards in Portland just a few months ago that loudly proclaimed him as the protector of ANWR for future generations? When drilling for oil came to a vote last week, he backed an amendment to remove drilling. As soon as that failed, he voted for the bill WITH DRILLING. The standout vote for drilling among Oregon/Washington delegation.

  • Wayne Brady (unverified)
    (Show?)

    You worry about Senator Smith being too far to the right? If he were any farther to the left, he would have to push Senator Kennedy out of the way.

  • (Show?)

    You worry about Senator Smith being too far to the right? If he were any farther to the left, he would have to push Senator Kennedy out of the way.

    You should pressure the Republican party to get a strong far-right candidate to run against Smith in the primary. I'm sure Ty Pettit would really appreciate it.

connect with blueoregon