Environmental ratings for candidates for Governor
In light of the recent postings on the Governor's race, I thought it would be useful to post the major candidates' and potential candidates' ratings on OLCV's Environmental Scorecard for the Oregon Legislature.
Bear in mind that we only have legislative voting records. I include Kulongoski's ratings from when he was a legislator. A broader OLCV assessment of his record as Governor will await for a different post/forum, when appropriate.
These ratings do not include the 2005 Session. Ratings for 2005 will come out in late September and will be posted at that time at www.olcv.org.
This exercise also involves comparing folks voting on different bills in very different sessions.
With those caveats behind me, in alphabetical order:
* State Senator Jason Atkinson, 1999, 2001, and 2003 sessions: average rating 10.0%
* Governor Ted Kulongoski, in Legislature 1977, 1979, and 1981 sessions: average rating 98.3%
* Former State legislator Kevin Mannix, in Legislature 1999, 1995, 1993, 1991, and 1989 sessions: average rating 50.2%. Note: his rating as a Republican in 1999 was 9%. His rating during his previous time when he was a Democrat (remember that?) was 60.5%.
* Ron Saxton. No voting record on the environment. But rest assured we've been paying attention to his public statements from his 2002 run and since then. Don't assume he's a moderate on the environment, just because he is on other issues.
* Lane County Commissioner Pete Sorenson, in the State Senate, 1995, rating: 96.0%
* State Senator Vicki Walker, 1999, 2001, and 2003 sessions: average rating 90.0%
* State Senator Ben Westlund, in Legislature 1997, 1999, 2001, and 2003 sessions; average rating 8.3%.
|
August 25, 2005 |
Jonathan Poisner | Comments (12 so far)
| Share on Facebook |
Sponsored Advertising
Comments
Posted by: Sid Leader | Aug 25, 2005 10:40:32 AM
Does Kevin Mannix still live in Oregon?
I haven't heard from him, nor has he won an election, since the last century.
He still kickin?
Posted by: Oregonson | Aug 25, 2005 11:47:16 AM
Can someone provide real background (rather than rhetoric) on the Mannix switch?
I hadn't know about the switch.
Posted by: Sid Leader | Aug 25, 2005 12:14:45 PM
And you can be sure that when the Democratic party runs the WHite House and Congress again, Kev will switch back.
He likes to follow the money.
Can't really blame Kev, you seen the price of gas lately?
$3.52 in Fresno.
2 cents in Baghdad.
Posted by: Betty | Aug 25, 2005 12:14:59 PM
I'm sure there are a lot of explanations for why Mannix switched parties, but here is mine:
Mannix was a moderate-to-conservative Democrat, who loved to be the *tough on crime* guy. When Ted Kulongoski decided not to run again for Attorney General, Mannix seemed to be the heir-apparent. In fact, even though he was running as a Democrat (in 1996), the Republicans cleared the field for him because they thought he would be a decent AG.
But Democrats -- in particular, Governor Kitzhaber, started to get nervous. Oregon hasn't had an activist AG in recent memory, and Kitz was worried that Kevin would be the worst kind of shoot-em-up, grandstanding Attorney General. Kitz was right; he would have been.
So in the 11th Hour -- just before the filing deadline -- a group of Dems headed by the Governor recruited Hardy Myers, the former Speaker of the House, to run against Mannix in the primary. Hardy won and wound up having a cake-walk though the General election, because the Republicans hadn't put up a credible candidate expecting that Mannix would be the nominee.
Kevin was burned. Big time. He had been *expecting* to be the next AG for years. And he was blindsided by the leaders of his own party.
So he left. Not because the party left him, but because the party left his pride... in the path of a bulldozer.
Posted by: Patrick Allen | Aug 25, 2005 4:03:21 PM
Re the AG race, Mannix's pro-life stand is what really concerned many Dems and was a major factor in the effort to draft Myers. My recollection is that Mannix's switch was couched in much discussion about the Dem's tent not being big enough for a variety of opinions on abortion.
Posted by: Betty | Aug 25, 2005 4:35:58 PM
Patrick,
That's a stretch. While Mannix's pro-life views may have contributed to the discomfort Governor Kitzhaber and others had with him, I don't recall abortion being an issue in the 1996 primary race. Mannix lost that race because Hardy was universally well respected as a measured, thoughtful leader. (Hardy didn't get every newspaper endorsement in the state for being pro-choice!)
So although Mannix may have *said* he was leaving because of his pro-life views, abortion had very little to do with the party's ultimate rejection of him for AG.
I also find it implausible that Mannix left the party because of his views on abortion given the constant stream of vocal pro-life Democrats we've had leading the party, from Mario Cuomo to Harry Reid.
A bruised ego can be a big motivator!
-B
Posted by: Jerry | Aug 25, 2005 8:07:46 PM
While I commend OLCV for putting the rankings together, I wish there was a way to evaluate Governor Kulongski as opposed to the Representative/Senator Kulongoski who represented Eugene nearly 25 years ago. As a casual observer of Salem this legislature, I didn't see Governor Kulongoski put any muscle behind ANYTHING that could be considered environmentally positive. On biofuels, continued dewatering of the Deschutes and Klamath rivers, coho salmon delistings, and state forest issues, he was either AWOL or actively engaged in moving the anti-environmental agenda.
I know that education was the Dems' top priority, but if a candidate is going to run as an environmentalist (Ted did) then I expect a little more effort when the legislature is in session.
Where's Kitzhaber when you need him?
Posted by: Don Saxton | Aug 25, 2005 10:30:27 PM
Re:Ron Saxton and the environment-
One must look at Ron as a contender who would like to be known as Environmentally Friendly, ala Tom Mc Call, but the exigencies of getting voted in preclude upsetting Downstate Republicans and Eastern Oregon Conservatives who feel Environmental regulations are too restrictive as it is.
Mannix is nothing but a sell out to the highest bidder- his record shows that!!!
Posted by: Chris Shays | Aug 27, 2005 6:40:16 PM
What do you get when you have a Democratic party with a top priority of getting more money for education, and a Republican party with a top priority of watering down or weakening environmental laws?
The same kind of end of session, grand compromises we've been getting from our state legislature for the past 15 years: Republicans agreeing to give a little more money for education, and Democrats agreeing to water down whatever environmental law or bill that happens to be in play that year. It's becoming the only game the parties can play, with stalemates on all other issues.
Hence Kulongoski's support and lobbying for so many anti-environmental bills and provisions this year.
Posted by: Chris Shays | Aug 27, 2005 6:50:59 PM
I'd vote for Ron Saxton if I thought he would be like my namesake, Republican Congressman Christopher Shays in Connecticut, or like the legendary Gov. Tom McCall.
But I'm afraid that he might turn out to be the second coming of Bob Packwood. i.e., moderate on abortion, but fire and brimstone on the environment, and anti Endangered Species Act.
Posted by: Dotted Yello | Oct 1, 2005 3:34:07 AM
Mannix was actaully pretty good on the environment... last time he ran, at SOU he said that he woudl have the Willamette river cleaned up in 5 years. What has Ted done for us? Nothing. He hasn't even tried. If Mannix did it half assed and only did it in ten, or got halfway there, it would be better than any of our own Gov's have given us. The last one who seemed to give a crap about the river was McCall.
And Saxton would be Kulongoski in a dress. Listen to what he says, he gives no specifics. And no, he can't win. He has no plan, and he is closer to the Goldschmidt scandals than Kulongoski. How many of us, given the choice between a progressive democrat we dont particularly like who is a corrupt enabler of Goldschmidt's looting of Oregon, and a big fat question mark of a weak kneed Republican we dont particularly like who is a corrupt enabler of Goldschmidt's looting of Oregon, would pick the Republican version of the soulless moron we have now? Nobody else would, either.
Some of my Republican friends are just as pissed about the Gorge Casino as we are...not just for hte environmental concerns, and not for what we think they would be mad at (people gambling), but also because it is blatantly racist to give permission to one group of people (native Americans) what we wouldn't give permission to another group of people (any other American) to do. I couldn't build a bike shop or a kayak rental shop on the water in the gorge because of the color of my skin...why should native Americans be allowed to build off reservation land? Is Ted really suggesting that whatever property a native American buys is sovereign reservation land and therefore not subject to American laws? What a pantload!
A Republican would probably be better, at least we wouldn't get blamed for the ineptitude of the leaderless governors we have had for the past decade.
Note: The presence of any individual above does not imply an endorsement by BlueOregon. The selection of faces shown is done by Facebook. Visit BlueOregon on Facebook.
Post a comment
Posted by: Kari Chisholm | Aug 25, 2005 9:55:57 AM
Kevin Mannix's twin voting records fascinate and astonish me. Most Republicans, Kevin included, like to claim that "I didn't leave the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party left me."
But, when he had a chance to put his votes down, he went from being a 60% enviro (not great, but middling) to a 9% enviro. All that changed was his party affiliation.
In other words, Kevin Mannix blows with the winds of partisan grandstanding. Rather than standing on his convictions, he played the same ol' red-team/blue-team junk.
His environmental voting record puts the lie to his well-cultivated "man of principle" persona. Mannix is a fraud and a sham.