YearlyKos Wrap-Up

Mary Conley

There's been a fair amount of wailing in the blogosphere about this conference. Yes, it was in a terrible facility. Yes, we hiked huge amounts to get between sessions. No, it wasn't as cozy as last year. But I think we miss the point that, as they say in the meditation world, last year we had beginners' mind. We were totally open to not knowing what to expect. This year, expectations were had - and the conference ended with the news that there will be no more "YearlyKos" conventions. From now on, it will be the "Netroots Nation" convention, which may open it up to more blog groups like BlogHer, which had their convention the weekend before.

Indeed, until blogging starts paying, this crowd needs to look for economies of scale and make it cheaper and easier to attend... but, that being said... I'll give you the asked for think-tank update and other thoughts on the flip.

First, the think tank session (only one of two was really about that), was informative in that the ones who were here seem very anxious to have bloggers use them as resources. Evidently, we already DO have a group of progressive think tanks doing the research and crunching the numbers we need to make coherent arguments. I made them all promise that their offices would accept calls from bloggers so that I wasn't putting out useless info. Here's the list of think tanks who want your help and want to help you. Because I'm exhausted, I'm not going to detail what they all do. I encourage you to click on them and explore:

The Drum Major Institute

Public Citizen

Think Progress

Progressive States Network
(David Sirota is one of their team)

Rockridge Institute
(George Lakoff's group)

Policy Link

Commonweal Institute

Roosevelt Institution
("the nation's first student think tank")

Conservative Truths
(tracks down stats behind the claims of conservatives)

Basically, the lesson is that any think tank worth its salt should take your call and be anxious to give you the facts and research you need. We don't need to go and re-invent the wheel. Maybe that's a key difference in the past year - that bloggers are now seen as alternative media outlets for groups like think tanks and they're willing to help.

One of the other most interesting things I learned this week was from Gov. Dean at his speech Friday night: that the most important thing we can do immediately is get young people registered to vote and then get them to vote. As I was heading to my room to crash one night, I ran into this tall guy named Jefferson Smith in the hall and shared some of this with him - and he knew most of it:

That if you vote three times in a row, you're likely to vote the rest of your life - and HOW you vote is an indicator of how you're likely to vote for the rest of your life. The decline in turnout we've seen in recent years nationwide is a result of the lack of outreach to young people in the Reagan era.

The best news on the stats about this demographic, however, is that, while turnout among different racial groups across all ages varied in 2004, turnout among people under 25 was up and didn't differ at all between races. Turnout in 2004 for those under 25 was 53%, regardless of race.

Gov. Dean posed the thought that this generation doesn't react to politics along racial lines the way the world did when we Baby Boomers were kids and that maybe, even though we didn't create the race-neutral, politically active world we wanted for ourselves, maybe we did pass that vision on to our children.

Now we just have to show them that they have the power to see it through.

I'll let Kari put his two cents in on the rest of the conference. The presidential candidates panel was great and the buzz on Hillary was surprisingly good. She did turn out for a breakout session after all, and the word is the conference got her plans wrong (though she did hers before the panel, instead of after like everyone else, which lost her some audience who didn't get the word). Everyone said she's very smart and competent, and if we end up with her as a candidate, she's one we can all work for. I was surprised, but still impressed that we have such a solid field to choose from.

On the charges that we were a "clique-y" conference, I have to totally disagree. I did hang out some with people I'd met last year, but mostly not. There is absolutely no way you could not feel incredibly engaged and welcome in this crowd. It was great to have Oregonians like Kari and Carla here, but even without them, I had plenty of people to hang out with any time of day or night. It may just be that bloggers are used to being a solitary lot and didn't get the easy opportunities to be crammed together for parties the way we did last year. To solve that problem, I'll encourage everyone to practice their conversational skills (i.e., get out more) between now and next year.

Onward and upward. I look forward to being home, back in the world where my vegetarian lifestyle is not something subversive... and back to my dog, who evidently is hanging out by the dogsitter's door.

'Til next year, it's been nice chatting with you all back on Blue O. Keep the faith and start working hard for your candidates. November 2008 will be here before you know it.

  • verasoie (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Where is next year's YearlyKos, or "Netroots Nation" as I guess they're going to start calling it now?

    Minneapolis?

    Upstage the Republican national convention and give Al Franken lots of love?

    In any case, it should be a strategic choice in a swing-state, and Denver would be a good one if not for the Democratic convention taking place there.

    Other top choices: Portland (my favorite, hometown choice!), Virginia (Richmond?), Texas (Dallas?).

    Second tier choices: Kentucky, Georgia (Atlanta).

    Wherever it is, it should be strategic as it is an election year, so at the very least a competitive Senate seat should be in play in the state, if not several House seats to boot and perhaps the state should be a Presidential swing-state.

  • Matthew Sutton (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Did Hillary really get booed and hissed at this event for refusing to stop taking donations from federal lobbyists?

  • (Show?)

    I didn't hear her get booed per se, but a lot of people laughed when she claimed lobbyists don't have any influence...

  • East Bank Thom (unverified)
    (Show?)

    It was sort of the gen-X version of booing. Clinton got hit where she can be hurt in the primary. It's not that she claimed that lobbyists don't have influence, it's that they won't influence her (which yielded an audible negative response - as much as i could tell from the video coverage). With Obama and Edwards on either side, she was set up for a firing squad. She knew it. For what it's worth, the Sunday talking heads acknowledged the bullshiatiness of her response while commenting positively on her ability to take the heat. Edwards response to her was replayed as it pretty much succinctly belied Clinton's position. Now, move along. Nothing to see here...

  • (Show?)

    Mary, you are awesome.
    How do you feel about lack of women and/or diversity at the event? I read a couple articles that stated this as a complaint.

  • (Show?)

    I thought she got booed and hissed when she said that lobbyists represent, "yes, real Americans..."

  • mconley (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Back on Oregon terra firma, sans heat and humidity. I surely do love our home state.

    Verasoie: The decision on location won't be made yet for months, so we'll all (including you) have a chance to weigh in. After running a conference in Portland last month, I will totally push it for so many reasons - easy access to food, great public transit, actual things to do at night, etc. I also think Baltimore would be a good choice, as we haven't yet made it easy for the East Coasters to partake.

    Karol: Actually, there seemed to be a lot more women this time, and at least a growing percentage of African-American women, albeit still small. I had many, many conversations with some really interesting women of color and think I've made at least one new actual friend. Of course, we talked about the racial disparity, but in the worlds we both worked in, we're always a minority one way or another, so I guess it didn't feel like anything new. I didn't really see much Hispanic female representation at all.

    I didn't wax rhapsodic this time about the warm fuzzy glow post-conference because it isn't quite the same as last time - but I do think that all the women I spoke to felt we're becoming a stronger presence. There was even one session called "Blogging While Female" that made me think the conversations you and I have had about hostility to us when we blog are NOTHING compared to what some women have endured.

    I think we all felt there's strength in numbers and we're going to keep it up.

    Thanks to Kari for the astute, politically savvy wrap-up. He must have gotten more sleep than I did.

  • Matthew Sutton (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Youtube has some great videos of the Hillary Edwards Obama dust up about the lobbyist issues. Hillary got hammered.

  • (Show?)

    How do you feel about lack of women and/or diversity at the event? I read a couple articles that stated this as a complaint.

    I didn't do a count, and don't know the numbers, but I'll say this... I was struck by the whiteness of the crowd, but not the maleness. There were plenty of women around.

    I'll also say this: I was impressed by the age diversity of the crowd. There have been some critics talking about the relative youth of the crowd, but they had to have been hanging around the bar late-night, not in the sessions during the day. Lots and lots of folks in their 50s, 60s, and 70s.

  • Mrs. Robinson (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I think we should make a big push for Portland next year. Great transit, a much better city experience (McCormick is basically an island on the South Side, with nowhere to go unless you take a cab); and the LEED-compliant convention center will a) fit the size of the crowd much better (McC was just TOO BIG!) and b) enable us to truly walk our talk in terms of enviro and energy values.

    As Kari said: The whiteness was disturbing (though there are reasons for this, according to SuperSpade -- another discussion), but the prominence of women was really striking. When you consider that some of the community's top voices -- Christy and Jane, Taylor Marsh, Digby, McJoan -- are female, and were on prominent display, it's actually wonderful to see how far we've come in just a couple years. I'm encouraged that a similar push to recruit and promote black and brown voices may have similarly fast results.

    Hillary's comment garnered more groaning, derisive laughter than actual boos -- and it was far louder than what you hear in the videos. Some news shows showed Obama's follow-up, but few of them showed Edwards putting her down utterly and completely simply by asking the crowd how many of them had a lobbyist working on their behalf. I doubt six hands in 1500 went up. (Mine was one, but I'm a member of the AFL.) That, right there, blew her point totally out of the water. It was a great moment, actually.

    <h2>Mary, glad to hear you got home OK. It was great doing the Art Institute with you!</h2>

connect with blueoregon