That is the question.
Today's headline over at the Oregonian discusses one of the many issues the Oregon Legislature will tackle this session (starting with a hearing today): whether to require that our water be fluoridated. One side suggests that for the sake of the salmon and safe drinking water we should not. Meanwhile the Oregon Dental association is behind the idea, pitching how much money it will save Oregonians on future dental treatments.
Is such an idea a good idea in such an "independent-minded" place like Oregon? Discuss.