SD 17: Sam Chase & Brad Avakian
On Thursday, the Oregonian paid some attention to the Democratic primary race in Senate District 17 - northwest Portland and northeast Washington County. The seat is currently held by Senator Charlie Ringo, who declined to run for re-election.
The two candidates are attorney and state representative Brad Avakian and affordable housing advocate Sam Chase.
Avakian says his experience with the budget process, education funding and other critical subjects will let him hit the ground running. He has already backed a lot of legislation that Chase says is important. And he says Chase lacks critical connections. "He cannot step into that group with the effective relationships I have been able to build over the last two sessions," Avakian said.Chase says Avakian's experience is a liability. Avakian has had two terms to make things better, but he has been part of the problem in Salem, not part of the solution, Chase said. Strong leadership is the answer. "I'm willing to be a leader and stand up," Chase said. "To me, that's the fundamental difference in this race. I'm not a politician. I think that's a good thing."
Are you supporting one of these two candidates? Tell us why. Discuss.
|
April 18, 2006 |
in the news 2006 | Comments (123 so far)
| Share on Facebook |
Sponsored Advertising
Comments
Posted by: MikeSelvaggio | Apr 18, 2006 11:09:48 AM
Brad Avakian's years of service to his constituents and experience in the Capitol are perhaps the most valuable legislative assets the residents of Senate District 17 could hope for in the State Capitol next session. I must disagree with the characterization of Brad Avakian's experience as a "liability."
As a staffer for Senator Ringo, I had the priviledge of working closely with Representative Avakian and his office (including Dustin) on many issues important to District 17. I came to know him as not only personally dedicated, but also as a thoughtful, knowledgable, and effective statesman.
In my opinion, the voters of District 17 are best served by the experience that Brad Avakian has already put to work for them.
Posted by: Jen Shmikler | Apr 18, 2006 11:31:37 AM
In my effort to procrastinate studying for exams, I must take a brief moment to be a zealous advocate for Brad Avakian. He is truly a common-sense leader who has the necessary commitment and dedication required to be EFFECTIVE in Salem. I cannot say enough wonderful things about him! He truly deserves support from the progressive community!
Posted by: Debbie Dorris | Apr 18, 2006 11:32:40 AM
Like Dustin, I too have had to the honor to work with Brad Avakian. He is a dedicated public servant with a true passion for public education. Brad understands the importance of building relationships and comradery with his fellow legislators – an art that is disappearing at the Capitol. Brad's colleagues consider him to be conscientious, thoughtful, and quick witted.
I support Avakian for two main reasons. The first is experience. Brad has served on the legislative budget committee (Ways and Means). Unfortunately, the passage of term limits forced out many of the Legislature's most experienced budgeters. This is the most important function of the Legislature and no matter how committed you are to "strong leadership,” the budget process is tough for rookies to grasp. If we ever want to begin addressing some of the serious issues facing Oregon, we need more people in the Legislature with Ways and Means experience.
Secondly, Avakian is one of the very few legislators currently serving in Salem with school aged children. I would be surprised if 10% of the current crew of legislators had school aged children. If 45% of the legislators had children in school (a number that would more accurately reflect the general population) – the school funding crisis would certainly be more of a priority.
I am sure that Sam Chase is a dedicated Oregonian with a passion for public service. I encourage him to find other avenues to serve his community. But right now – the Legislature is full of folks who really want to make a change – but like the experience to make it happen.
What Oregon needs right now is experience – elect Brad Avakian to the Senate!
Posted by: Winston Wolfe | Apr 18, 2006 11:47:11 AM
Experience is a liability?
What?
It is this kind of nonsensical logic that leads to democrats electing incompetent naredowells. I'm not saying that Chase is one. But come on man, if "experience is a liability" is the only thing you can run against Avakian with you are in serious trouble.
And Chase is in serious trouble. Avakian has been one of six effective democrats in the Karen Minnis gulag better know as the Oregon House of Representatives. Avakian managed to hold to his democratic principles in this pseudo-fascist state and get things done in the House. And Avakian managed all of this by using his knowledge, wit, compassion, and experience. Yes Sam, experience.
Avakian is a much more suited candidate for the Senate. He has a track record of keeping to democratic values and getting things accomplished in difficult situations.
Chase you seem like a nice guy with a heart of gold and I'm sure someday you will make a great legislator. But the next time you run for office I sincerely hope that the best reason for people to vote for you is not your "lack of experience."
"Toluca Lake. Its thirty minutes away. I'll be there in ten."
Posted by: Charlie Burr | Apr 18, 2006 11:47:23 AM
I have had the opportunity to work with both Brad and Charlie Ringo, and am truly excited about the prospect of Brad serving in this seat. I am enthusiastically supporting him in this race.
Eight years ago, Brad made the difficult decision to take on the most popular Republican in Washington County, Tom Hartung. Sam writes, "I'm willing to be a leader and stand up" -- but that's exactly how I'd describe Brad's jump into the electoral process. He wasn't motivated by ambition or statewide office, he was upset that music and arts were being cut from the schools and that Hartung was the deciding vote against the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.
The work of the 1998 campaign helped lay the ground work for Democrats fighting back and picking up seats in a key county for our state. Since winning office in 2002, Brad has been unwavering in his support for schools and smaller class sizes. He's won the sole endorsement of too many progressive organizations to mention and is a leader -- not just a vote -- on many critical issues.
I don't fault Sam for making a calculating political attack ("Chase says Avakian's experience is a liability") but that's exactly what it is: an attempt by a challenger to dilute the appeal of Brad's proven track record. I like Sam and appreciate his work on housing, but Brad's the better candidate in this race. I don't mean this to be snarky, but I do hope Sam will consider running for office again after this race.
Until then, voters have a clear choice in the May 16th primary -- civil rights attorney, proven legislator and certifiable good guy Brad Avakian.
Posted by: Sam Chase | Apr 18, 2006 12:02:50 PM
I am a regular blueoregon reader and wanted to take a minute to let folks know why I am running for Senate.
I have committed my adult life to community service. Locally, we've done great work for schools, affordable housing, and the environment, but now, our schools are truly in jeopardy of failing. For too long we've heard the legislature talk about solutions, but year after year we have to fix the wreckage with band aids and duct tape. We're stretched to the breaking point and we all know why: the failure of the legislature. We can do better.
I have two children who will be in public school soon. Our children need to graduate from great quality schools and universities that give them targeted degrees. Moreover, if we want to attract and retain great business and remain globally competitive, we need to produce a high quality, educated workforce.
I led a grassroots organizing effort to secure $197 million in bonds for public schools, but we can't patch together our schools with bond after levy after bond. We have to adequately fund schools at the state level. We can't do it playing defense or by staying silent on the most important issues. We need a forceful effort to repeal the corporate kicker, to make new development pay for new schools, and to pursue long term tax reform.
Last session I helped lead the passage of a bill that reduced rents for low income seniors and disabled. We made the case to Republicans in the house that it was good economic development and it passed the Senate, House and was signed by the Governor. I don't accept the notion that nothing can get done in Salem. If "non legislators" like us can get it done outside the legislature, I know we can get much more done with influence on the inside.
It takes people who will focus on good ideas first and figuring out the politics second.
I hope you'll join me in my campaign for the State Senate. You can reach me at 503-810-4504 or visit my website at www.samchase.org.
Sam
Posted by: LT | Apr 18, 2006 12:03:16 PM
Is Sam an advocate of term limits? How else to explain
Chase says Avakian's experience is a liability. Avakian has had two terms to make things better, but he has been part of the problem in Salem, not part of the solution, Chase said. Strong leadership is the answer. "I'm willing to be a leader and stand up," Chase said. "To me, that's the fundamental difference in this race. I'm not a politician. I think that's a good thing." ?
Sounds like someone who doesn't care who he hurts in his primary campaign.
I had the great pleasure to meet the wonderful Dustin who made the comment above.
I have been on Avakian's email newsletter list for some time.
He has one of the better (more informative) newsletters.
A member of the House Minority was supposed to make things better all by himself as some kind of Superman?
That quote is all I need to know about Sam Chase, but then I'm the one who was not impressed with Sorenson's "leader not a mediator". We need details, not slogans--a problem with candidates in both parties.
If Sam wants to impress people, let's hear / read his views on Jessica's Law.
Good idea? How to pay for?
Or is "experience is bad" all people are supposed to need?
Posted by: Debbie Dorris | Apr 18, 2006 12:11:10 PM
Just read Sam's post - and I can tell he wants to and has done good.
Im not much for primary politics - "hey lets spend our money fighting the really bad guys" mentality - but I think its great when savy-smart-dedicated Democrats want to serve in the Legislature.
Avakian's experience still makes him the far and away better choice.
Hey Sam - how about moving to Clackamas, Lane, or Marion counties and challenging some of the so called "moderate" R's there?
Posted by: Ed Dennis | Apr 18, 2006 12:15:04 PM
Brad Avakian has been in the minority party and that has been his only fault as far as I can see.
Assuming he can move into the majority he will be better able to accomplish his goals, our goals.
Brad is a beast, fighting for schools, a well rounded education for kids and smaller class sizes.
Go Brad!
Posted by: Nick Warren | Apr 18, 2006 12:20:07 PM
I have known Sam Chase since growing up together in Washington DC. Throughout the years, Sam has proven to be an effective advocate for education, protecting our environment and working to bridge gaps in social and economic injustice. Sam has two young girls and feels that the legislature has been unable to make any progress in fixing our public schools. Sam Chase is not a politician. He is a community advocate with a proven track record of success. As a friend of his and a community member I urge the voters in Senate District 17 to vote for Sam Chase
Posted by: Charlie Burr | Apr 18, 2006 12:21:47 PM
Debbie asked: Hey Sam - how about moving to Clackamas, Lane, or Marion counties and challenging some of the so called "moderate" R's there?
Or he could give this admittedly rough speech:
I'd like to first thank my supporters and friends for their support, long hours of hard work and the energy they've put in this campaign. As a first time candidate for public office, your help and encouragement has been truly humbling -- and I'll never forget how hard you fought over the past few months.We fought hard and came up short. Begining today, I am no longer seeking the Democratic nomination for Senate District 17. While my name may appear on the ballot, my campaign will no longer be active.
Instead, I am transferring my cash on hand -- every dime of the remaining $7,000 (or so) -- to candidate Rob Brading. I set about to change the culture of Salem, and removing Karen Minnis from office is the most cost-effective way to accomplish that goal.
Brad and I may differ on a few issues, but our similarities are more striking than differences around the margins. However, Karen Minnis represents a clear theat to our state.
I may not be an active candidate in this race, but I remain commmitted to working for real results on the issues we talked about over these past few months: affordable housing, schools and Oregon's environment.
I really believe Sam's a good guy who's done some solid work, but this campaign's not the best way to make a difference. As I wrote above, I do hope he'll run again.
Posted by: Pat Ryan | Apr 18, 2006 12:41:47 PM
Seems redundant, but let me add my support for Brad. He is one of the very few legislators from both parties, that tries to make every decision without looking over his shoulder at the Big Donors.
As such, he is a rare and invaluable asset in a body that has too many members pushing "convetional wisdom" and not nearly enough members using critical thinking skills to arrive at the best possible solutions.
I have absolutely nothing agains Mr. Chase and have heard only good things about him, but Avakian's too rare and valuable an asset to the Dem Caucus to be lightly tossed aside.
Posted by: Debbie Dorris | Apr 18, 2006 12:54:15 PM
Hey Charlie! Now we are voting where to send excess money - surely there are other worthy House candidates??
Clem, Roblan, Riley??
C ya in the Mempho...
Debbie
Posted by: Liz Smith Currie | Apr 18, 2006 12:56:10 PM
Sam Chase is an excellent candidate for State Senate. Sam is not only passionate about his community, but he knows the issues and is very well connected. He could easily step in to the senate and hit the ground running. We need people in Salem who will not just support affordable housing and schools, but will actually be able to make a difference. I believe Sam is the right person for this seat.
Posted by: Gavin Weld White | Apr 18, 2006 1:01:31 PM
The Multnomah Democrats are proud to support Brad Avakian in his race for the Oregon Senate. By funding education, protecting our environment, and helping all Oregonians get health care, Brad is standing up now for Oregon's future. Please join us in standing with Brad Avakian.
Posted by: LT | Apr 18, 2006 1:11:34 PM
Sam Chase may well be a great guy. Those who know him should work on his campaign. But he won't get the support of Avakian admirers unless he shows us more than
Last session I helped lead the passage of a bill that reduced rents for low income seniors and disabled. We made the case to Republicans in the house that it was good economic development and it passed the Senate, House and was signed by the Governor. I don't accept the notion that nothing can get done in Salem. If "non legislators" like us can get it done outside the legislature, I know we can get much more done with influence on the inside.
It takes people who will focus on good ideas first and figuring out the politics second.
Sam, what was the bill number?
Sorry, as much as I think discussion of ideas is lacking, someone wanting a quality incumbent to lose a primary because they believe in their friend should realize it takes more than just "he's a great guy" to win over skeptics. I know, I have been actively involved in primaries with more than one quality candidate.
No one ever built a following in this state by saying "forget that wonderful guy you've known for years and support our guy because he is better" without providing detailed proposals and accomplishments.
When there are 2 quality people in a primary, one is going to lose.
Posted by: Jennifer Warren | Apr 18, 2006 1:16:29 PM
I’m a less avid, but fairly regular reader of blueoregon.com – and honored to be included on the list of former staffers to Rep. Brad Avakian. I served, along with Dustin, during the 2003 session and handled both administrative and constituent affairs for Brad’s office.
I believe that Brad’s record and experience speak for themselves, and hardly need me to do that for him. His experience as a civil rights attorney, his commitment to public education and the well-being of the people in his district, and his deep and abiding respect for both his constituents and our civic process were evident every day that I worked with him, because they are simply a part of who he is.
I am sure that Sam Chase is an honorable and dedicated man who is committed to making our state a better place to live – but I really tire of hearing candidates with no experience in the legislature talk about the ‘lack of leadership’ or the ‘inability to get things done’ in Salem.
Working to pass a single piece of legislation is an excellent exercise in Civics - and the legislative process in general - and when the legislation really is something we can all support, it’s a cause for celebration. Sam is to be congratulated for his work to help make that happen... as are all the legislators who voted to pass the bill.
But working to pass a single piece of legislation does not a legislator make.
To disregard the impact of serving as a member of the minority party, and to assume that it was simply a 'lack of leadership' that allowed for the overpowering influence of the Speaker on all legislation that passed through the House – is simply disingenuous...particularly after having the above mentioned experience of working a bill in Salem.
Certainly our state needs all the bright, committed and honorable people it can find to serve in elected offices – so I concur with those who already know and respect Sam Chase, as another of those we hope to see in office someday. And I honestly hope that he will seriously consider Charlie Burr’s suggestion above. It’s about the Big Picture.
You hear the phrase ‘doing the work of the people’ quite often in Salem. Brad Avakian has been the embodiment of that phrase and his commitment and experience are far to valuable to lose. His constituents know it, and our state is luckier for it.
Posted by: Rep. Dave Hunt | Apr 18, 2006 1:28:46 PM
"We're stretched to the breaking point and we all know why: the failure of the legislature. We can do better."
The "Legislature's failure" to adequately fund schools is no more Brad Avakian's fault than the failure to pass a bio-fuels package is Jackie Dingfelder's fault or the failure to pass SB 1000 is Kate Brown's fault or the failture to reform the "double majority" election requirement is my fault. The fault lies squarely and completely with the House Republican party bosses.
I've seen first hand during the past two sessions how Brad Avakian fought tirelessly to increase our state's investments in education (Head Start, K-12, community colleges, and OUS) -- publicly and behind closed doors. No one in the Legislature cares more passionately about education nor has fought harder for education than Brad. No one.
As a key member of the House Democratic Leadership Team, Brad played a critical role in holding every House Democrat together behind a truly no-more-cuts K-12 budget and in opposition to the dismal $5.0 billion appropriation for which the House Republican party bosses fought.
To throw Brad and all legislators together as failures is really missing the problem: the House today is a dictatorship governed by Karen Minnis and Wayne Scott. Period.
We need Brad Avakian in the Senate -- AND we need new leadership in the House. THEN we will be able to begin rebuilding Oregon schools, health care, public safety, and infrastructure.
Posted by: Ross Williams | Apr 18, 2006 1:30:15 PM
someone wanting a quality incumbent to lose a primary
I thought this was an open seat. There is no incumbent. The question is why is Avakian running for the Senate instead of continuing to serve in the House?
Sam and Brad have the same amount of experience as state senators. None in either case. Brad's experience in the House may give him some small advantage once elected, but he appears to have an attitude problem if his talking points of his supporters are that he is entitled to the seat.
And it is troubling that there don't seem to be any accomplishments attached to all that experience his supporters talk about. Now that is tough for a D in the House, so you can hardly fault him. But having experienced failure is also not a positive qualification that makes you obviously better than someone who doesn't have that experience. If he runs on his record of success in Salem, Avakian surely deserves to lose.
Chase describes has a lot of experience that is needed in Salem. And he has a track record of success outside the legislature working with diverse groups of people. That is not taking anything away from Avakian, but his supporters should try to make the case for him. Having spent two years being frustrated and ineffective, no matter what the reason, is not a qualification for office.
Posted by: Kari Chisholm | Apr 18, 2006 1:33:56 PM
We should be so lucky to have two candidates of such high caliber in every race.
Here's why I'm supporting Sam.
He's been a tireless and creative advocate for affordable housing, securing millions of dollars to serve our community. Sam was also a key founder of X-PAC (where I first met him, nearly 10 years ago) working to get young people involved in politics and community service. If it weren't for Sam, the political environment in Oregon would be much different today. X-PAC's faded away now, but that's because we spun off so much talent to do great things in our community.
Brad's a great guy, too. But before everyone jumps on board with the solid and predictable pick, I'd ask you to find out why Sam's been endorsed by John Kitzhaber, Tom Potter, Elizabeth Furse, Rex Burkholder, Deborah Kafoury, and many others.
[Disclaimer: I built his website, but I don't speak for Sam or his campaign.]
Posted by: Ron Buel | Apr 18, 2006 1:38:10 PM
Although I respect and like Brad Avakian, I am supporting Sam Chase in this race. Sam has a unique record of accomplishment, especially in affordable housing. His leadership of Affordable Housing Now, an advocacy organization, built an amazing record of getting things on the street in City Hall and Salem. His leadership of the networking organization for affordable housing groups has built a powerful and cohesive force for good. Sam is bright, hard-working, and is a leader. There are a lot more important people than me on Sam's letterhead, but I am proud to be there. This is not for a seat that Avakian owns or currently holds. Sam had decided to run for it before Brad announced his candidacy. Sam is running a grass-roots effort, as one might expect from him.
Posted by: Dustin Buehler | Apr 18, 2006 1:49:52 PM
Hey Ross -- here's a list of accomplishments to chew on before your next post:
http://www.bradavakian.com/issues.html
Hey Sam -- two recommendations:
1. Send Jeff Alworth a thank you note right away for posting on blueoregon and burying this thread.
2. I once again find myself in agreement with Charlie Burr, the wise sage of Oregon politics. If you drop out of the race today and pledge your remaining funds to Rob Brading, I'll cut you a $100 check immediately. ;-)
Good hunting to both candidates (and supporters on both sides!).
Posted by: I'm supposed to be working right now | Apr 18, 2006 1:52:11 PM
C'mon Kari - that was too easy. Interested parties should visit www.bradavakian.com
and click the Endorsments link, or just scroll down a bit.
No one disputes that Sam Chase is a great guy. But is he really worth losing Brad Avakian from the legislature? Really?
And was Sam not a staffer for former Gov. Kitzhaber? I would hope a former boss would support him. Anyway, scroll down to State and Local Leaders, and you'll see the Brad's endorsement by another former Governor.
Media:
The Oregonian (click here to read endorsement)
Education:
Oregon Education Association
American Federation of Teachers-Oregon
Portland Association of Teachers
Beaverton Education Association
Oregon School Employees Association
Environment:
Oregon League of Conservation Voters
Oregon Natural Resources Council
Labor and Public Safety:
Oregon AFL-CIO
Service Employees International Union, Local 503
Oregon AFSCME Council 75
Oregon State Fire Fighters Council
Tualatin Valley Firefighters Local 1660
Oregon Council of Police Associations
Other Organizations:
Planned Parenthood
Basic Rights Oregon
Multnomah County Democrats
State and Local Leaders:
Former Oregon Governor Barbara Roberts
Oregon Attorney General Hardy Myers
State Treasurer Randall Edwards
State Labor Commissioner Dan Gardner
State Superintendent of Public Instruction Susan Castillo
Senate President Peter Courtney (Salem, Woodburn, Gervais)
Senate Majority Leader Kate Brown (Southeast Portland)
State Senator Alan Bates (Ashland)
State Senator Laurie Monnes-Anderson (Gresham)
State Senator Floyd Prozanski (Lane and Douglas Counties)
State Senator Kurt Schrader (Canby)
House Democratic Leader Jeff Merkley (Portland)
State Representative Jeff Barker (Beaverton, Aloha)
State Representative Mitch Greenlick (Northwest Portland and Washington County)
State Representative Mark Hass (Southwest Portland)
State Representative Paul Holvey (Eugene)
State Representative Dave Hunt (Clackamas County)
State Representative Mary Nolan (Southwest Portland)
State Representative Diane Rosenbaum (Southeast Portland)
Mike Osborne, Chair, Beaverton School Board
Karen Cunningham, Beaverton School Board
Ann Jacks, Beaverton School Board
Posted by: LT | Apr 18, 2006 1:55:30 PM
If Sam is such a great guy, maybe he can attend the Special Session this week and tell us first hand what he would have done differently had he been a member.
He may be the greatest guy in the world, but he lost me with the attack on Avakian.
Will he publicly promise to provide the same or better information through email newsletters that Avakian provided? Does he know how many town halls Avakian held in the district his first session and does Chase promise to meet or exceed that number of town halls in 2007?
Will he speak publicly about what goes on in caucus? Or is all that a secret because the legislature is a team sport and anyone who isn't an R member or a D member is just a voter who should be content to be a spectator? Did he approve of the "negotiation room" strategy where a few people decided budgets in a closed room? Does he think current Dem leadership should be re-elected? Why or why not?
Or is his a campaign of "my friends like me, I have these great endorsements, so you are supposed to trust that I will be better than a legislator many people have seen in action and admire."?
I have never met Sam Chase. He may be the greatest guy in the world. But long before I ever heard of Brad Avakian I was fed up with "my friends like me, you should like me too, without my having to talk publicly about my detailed proposals".
Posted by: K Bereman-Skelly | Apr 18, 2006 2:03:31 PM
I do not regularly post, but I feel compelled to comment here. It seems that staff members for Mr. Avakian were quick to write (in some cases multiple times) in his favor. Perhaps this is skewing the discussion.
I would like to voice my support for Mr. Chase.
Like many politicians, Mr. Avakian has proven he can advertise himself well and garner respect from his assistants and those with whom he directly works. Good job on the inside. But I consider the opinions of those whom he represents to be the real measure.
Perhaps he can "fight like a beast" but I prefer someone who negotiates like a fair, honest human being. Someone who just might get results from integrity and creative ideas, not political savvy.
Mr. Chase, with his record of innovative public service, and his leadership of an earnest campaign, in my opinion is clearly the superior leader of the two.
I prefer to make decisions based upon what I see, read, and hear, not based upon the comfort of a known commodity.
Posted by: Jerrod Killen | Apr 18, 2006 2:15:22 PM
Uh, K Bereman-Skelly -- you might be interested in the following email that was sent out earlier today from the Chase campaign (see below).
Perhaps you will re-consider your thought that "It seems that staff members for Mr. Avakian were quick to write (in some cases multiple times) in his favor."
Pot to kettle? Pretty clear contrast -- Brad uses his e-newsletters to keep in touch with his constituents, not to flood a blog with a grand total of 5 emails from supporters.
>>> 04/18/06 12:42 PM >>>
Sam Chase Needs your Support!
Hello, my name is Meredith Shield and as many of you know, I am Sam?s Campaign Manager. Working with Sam has been such a wonderful and positive experience. Sam is doing a great job and meeting all of his goals.
Blue Oregon, a progressive blog posted an article about Sam?s race this morning at blueoregon.com. The BEST way that you can support Sam Chase today would be to spend 5 minutes writing a quick response to the article saying why you support Sam.
This is a respected and well known political blog in the area. Doing something as small as this can have a great impact on the voters of the district.
Please visit blueoregon.com and post a comment on why you support Sam today!
Thank you for your continued support!
Meredith Shield
Campaign Manager
Posted by: MikeSelvaggio | Apr 18, 2006 2:18:01 PM
I thought this was an open seat. There is no incumbent.
Maybe not, but Brad Avakian has been working hard for the constituents of Senate District 17 for the past two sessions.
While it may not confer a title of incumbency, it does in my mind make Brad Avakian the candidate who is most connected to the legislative needs of the district and most situated to effectively steward those needs through the Capitol.
I have seen Brad Avakian working with Senator Ringo for the past two sessions... the voters of Senate District 17 would do very well to keep Avakian on as their advocate.
Posted by: Chuck Currie | Apr 18, 2006 2:18:14 PM
I’m also supporting Sam Chase. Experience does matter in public service and Sam has just the right mix of experience that will make him a terrific leader in Salem. He has worked in local government and headed a non-profit organization fighting for affordable housing in Oregon (a particularly important issue in his district). Like Sam, I’m a parent whose kids will be in public school before long. I want his voice at the capitol fighting for public education and housing. Oregon would benefit from his talent.
Posted by: torridjoe | Apr 18, 2006 2:23:08 PM
I hear Brad Avakian kicks puppies after feeding them meth, and Sam Chase would miss most Senate business because he doesn't sober up until after noon.
:)
Posted by: Steven Maurer | Apr 18, 2006 2:28:13 PM
Wow. With all the big names weighing in, I feel quite redundant. Still, I think I have a few points to add.
First, Sam Chase isn't beyond the pale making his arguments. If he thinks he could have done better than Rep. Avakian in the House under Minnis, he can certainly claim that in the primary, and no one should hold it against him.
On the other hand, no one needs to believe him, either. I certainly don't. Not to take anything away from Mr. Chase, but it's always easier to criticize than it is to accomplish, especially when you're dealing with the zero-sum game that is legislative politics. And the fact that he doesn't acknowledge how difficult a job being a minority member is, doesn't speak well for being able to - to use the modern cliché - "get the job done" as legislator.
Brad Avakian, on the other hand, has navigated that hostile environment so adeptly, he's one of the few Democratic legislators who can say they did accomplish something, even under Minis's thumb. He should be able to use his expertise to an even greater degree in the Senate.
In fact, the only negative I can about Rep. Avakian being elected to the Senate is that the House is going to sorely miss his leadership. First things first, but I think so highly of him, I hope he doesn't stop at just being a State Senator.
Posted by: LT | Apr 18, 2006 2:46:30 PM
For people I admire who support Sam, that is fine with me. But I agree with Steven:
"On the other hand, no one needs to believe him, either. I certainly don't. Not to take anything away from Mr. Chase, but it's always easier to criticize than it is to accomplish, especially when you're dealing with the zero-sum game that is legislative politics. And the fact that he doesn't acknowledge how difficult a job being a minority member is, doesn't speak well for being able to - to use the modern cliché - "get the job done" as legislator."
An advocate of schools and housing should care not just about current budgets but also budgets of future years. If the addition to Measure 11 sentences in Jessica's Law is not a current concern but a future concern, someone who claims to be an advocate and better than a current state rep. should tell us how he intends to guard schools and housing from the future costs of Jessica's Law. Do we need to reform the current tax and budget structure, or is the email sent from your campaign manager "The BEST way that you can support Sam Chase today would be to spend 5 minutes writing a quick response to the article saying why you support Sam." all we need to know about how you would tackle budget and spending issues?
Or doesn't that matter because they only thing needed now is to win the primary, and details like how to fund all necessary services can be solved later by "leadership" of someone who has never served in a minority caucus?
We don't know for sure who will be the majority caucus (if there were 14 of each, along with Westlund and Gordly--a possibility if Ben is not elected Gov.--it will be much like the 15-15 session) why would a community activist function better in that circumstance than a former state rep. who has survived being in a minority caucus? Because his friends think he'll do better and that is all we need to know?
Let's see Sam come on here and answer those questions.
Posted by: Jennifer Warren | Apr 18, 2006 2:48:00 PM
As one of the two Salem staffers who actually worked for, as opposed to with, Rep. Avakian (and I won't speak for Dustin) I could respond in a number of ways to the post by K Bereman-Skelly - which is highly offensive, incredibly innacurate, and pretty darn close to dropping us all into the mud pit. He does HIS candidate no favors.
Suffice to say that I am proud and very grateful to have had the chance to serve as a legislative staffer -period. I would recommend the experience to anyone who has the opportunity. The fact that I worked for Brad Avakian (and Jeff Barker) was gravy.
But it gave me, and all of us who worked 'for the people', a bird's eye view of what happens in Salem. And so, yes - we do speak with a level of experience that few people have.
Some of those legislators carried their responsibilities with distinction, some just kept their seats warm, and some carried water for the Speaker.
K Bereman-Skelly may find his/her candidate to be running an earnest campaign. I don't see the 'integrity' - but do find it slightly 'creative' and fairly politicaly 'savvy' to quote the Oregonian's endorsement of Brad Avakian out of context to appear as an endorsement for Sam Chase.
Let's keep to the topic of issues and qualifications. I would strongly suggest that the above writer actually talk to constituents in Rep. Avakian's district. He will find that Brad has no problem running on his record of service.
Posted by: Jenni Simonis | Apr 18, 2006 2:48:46 PM
I just wanted to weigh in and say I support Brad Avakian. And no, I've never worked for him. I'd actually never met him in person prior to last month. However, I had heard his name come up multiple times last session as someone fighting for education and health care (among other issues).
We have a daughter who will start school in the 07-08 school year, so I understand the importance of education.
We're also a family with high medical insurance costs-- even though we get insurance through a large corporate employer, it costs more than we can afford (especially when you make less than $28K/year). However, due to having a child and my past medical problems, we can't afford not to. Even with a huge increase in our bi-weekly cost, our co-pays shot up and they added co-insurance as well.
So as you can see, health care/insurance and education are topics near and dear to my heart. That's a big reason why I'm supporting Brad Avakian for this seat.
Posted by: Rep. Larry Galizio | Apr 18, 2006 3:24:06 PM
Brad Avakian honors the institution and the state with his public service.
Brad taught me how to canvass, and his work ethic was inspirational as well as instructive.
Senator Avakian will bring honor and intelligence to SD 17 and he deserves your support.
Posted by: Kari Chisholm | Apr 18, 2006 3:24:29 PM
Jennifer... Could you quote exactly which portions of Bereman-Skelly's comments were "highly offensive, incredibly innacurate, and pretty darn close to dropping us all into the mud pit"?
I don't see anything beyond the pale in her comments.
Posted by: Phil Donovan | Apr 18, 2006 3:31:02 PM
While there appears to be a lot of talk about 'who's the greater guy' in this race, I want to post my take on why Sam should be elected to the Senate: No one in the current legislative body makes affordable housing a priority.
Not since a Kafoury (Gretchen or Deborah) served has there been someone willing to be an affordable housing champion. I'm not saying Brad is bad on the issue, but Sam's someone who can be great.
Let's face it, there's lots of folks willing to be a good education vote and stand up for kids. But few are serving with Sam's background in affordable housing. My two cents...
Posted by: Winston Wolfe | Apr 18, 2006 3:36:03 PM
torridjoe
You forgot both of them are terrorist, too!
:)
"Of course you are a character, doesn't mean you have character."
Posted by: Andrew Simon | Apr 18, 2006 4:07:15 PM
I'm another Blue Oregonian for Brad Avakian.
I'm also proud to say that he is my State Representative and I look forward to him representing District 17 in the State Senate next year.
Posted by: Jennifer Warren | Apr 18, 2006 4:11:43 PM
"Perhaps he can "fight like a beast" but I prefer someone who negotiates like a fair, honest human being. Someone who just might get results from integrity and creative ideas, not political savvy. "
(emphasis added)
Kari -
Did I read that incorrectly? If so, I certainly apologize.
I did find offensive the suggestion that staff members are incapable of independent thought...
And I did find the comment about 'someone who negotiates like a fair, honest human being. Someone who just might get results from integrity and creative ideas, not political savvy' to be highly inaccurate -and offensive- in describing Brad's record. Perhaps Ms. Bereman-Skelley could clarify.
(Not too mention the fact that 'political savvy' is not inherently evil - nor is it a bad thing to have when it comes to working bills through the legislature. Or did Mr. Chase simply find success with his issue through sheer integrity and creativity?)
I absolutely respect the right of every writer to their opinions, including Ms. Bereman-Skelly. If your preference is one candidate over another for specific reasons - then by all means, talk about the specifics.
I would simply hope that we keep the discussion to qualifications and issues, not innuendo and commentary sans facts.
Posted by: Jeff Alworth | Apr 18, 2006 5:14:51 PM
I think this thread represents two firsts at BlueOregon: 40 posts on a campaign, and no one has launched a hit piece. The most vicious attack was for being "politically savvy." I think this is a shark tank most politicians would willing dive into.
Also, I don't know that we've ever had anyone lobby for people to comment in favor of a candidate on the comment threads here. I'm not sure that the comment threads carry such weight among voters, but it's nice to think someone does.
It looks to me like the Democratic Party is the big winner in this election--no matter who wins the primary.
Posted by: Rep. Peter Buckley | Apr 18, 2006 5:27:29 PM
I have the greatest respect for Brad--as mentioned previously, my only concern about his going to the Senate is how much we will miss him in the House. He is an outstanding legislator--we're lucky to have him.
I have to definitely disagree with Sam's comment that Brad is part of the problem. Brad is a huge part of the solution, and has been every single day in Salem. When he joins the majority in the Senate, he will shine even brighter.
PB
Posted by: Jesse O | Apr 18, 2006 5:36:49 PM
Well, looking at the C&Es and endorsement lists, Brad's got this one wrapped up. Based on his experience, I think he'll do a great job. I agree with the folks saying -- thanks for being both great candidates, now let's move on and not burn our energy here.
That said, Sam's got Kitzhaber on his side, and Brad's got The Oregonian and the Multnomah County Dems, which usually drags people down.
Posted by: Ross Williams | Apr 18, 2006 5:38:38 PM
"Brad Avakian, on the other hand, has navigated that hostile environment so adeptly, he's one of the few Democratic legislators who can say they did accomplish something, even under Minis's thumb."
Again - what were those accomplishments. The web site has a long list of things he supports and bills he voted for. I suppose you can call that an accomplishment. But to take one vote:
"# Responsible land use planning. Brad helped pass Senate Bill 82 (2005), creating a task force to promote responsible land use planning that protects Oregon's farmland and natural beauty."
This bill passed both houses unanimously. Maybe Avakian had a larger role than voting for it, but there is nothing to indicate that is the case and its kind of hard to see how he would have as a minority member in the House. So he helped pass it along with every Republican legislator.
There are a whole bunch of things he helped passed listed on that site - too many for him to have had any real involvement in all of them. That lengthy list of things he has done look like little more than a repetition of the fact that he was a legislator. Its fine if he wants to puff up that stuff for the web site. But his supporters here need to start talking about why Avakian instead of every other legislator who cares about kids.
Its pretty clear Sam is going to be a real advocate for affordable housing, he's walked the walk on that issue for a long time. I would expect the folks that spent six months in Salem working with Avakian to support him. If they didn't, you would have to ask why not? But the fact that he has the support of his friends who are political junkies doesn't mean that much. What's he going to do? Sam's told us. Lets hear from Avakian's supporters.
Posted by: ML Veden | Apr 18, 2006 5:58:04 PM
I don't have much to add to this discussion, as Brad was never my representative (though I was peripherally involved with his first campaign) but I'm curious as to why *less* experience for a job makes one *more* qualified. I'm also with Jennifer about the somewhat alarming dichotomy being drawn between "creativity and integrity" and "political savvy". Why are these things mutually exclusive? If an experienced legislator was exhibiting signs of apathy or incompetence, or truly in the pocket of some evil-doers, there might be a warrant for running a primary race against them. Good luck making that argument to the constituents Brad has tirelessly served for these last four years.
Posted by: Ross Williams | Apr 18, 2006 7:27:03 PM
If an experienced legislator was exhibiting signs of apathy or incompetence, or truly in the pocket of some evil-doers, there might be a warrant for running a primary race against them.
So any representative who runs for the Senate is presumed to be superior to any other candidate until proven otherwise?
Good luck making that argument to the constituents Brad has tirelessly served for these last four years.
Well, that is only half the district. And even they might look at his record and ask "What has he actually accomplished fo us that any suburban legislator won't?" I suspect that Sam Chase can "help" pass bills by unanimous votes as well as Brad Avakian.
But for them and the other half of the district Sam Chase has specific experience in affordable housing and non-profit development. He has a real record of advocacy on a whole range of other urban development issues including protection of urban green spaces and transportion. Those experiences will allow him to make a unique contribution in Salem.
I'm trying to figure out what won't happen if Brad Avakian doesn't spend next spring voting in Salem. The record his supporters present here indicates the answer is not much. The argument seems to be he's a nice guy, smart and easy to get along with. All those qualifications apply equally to Sam Chase.
Posted by: JHL | Apr 18, 2006 8:18:28 PM
Oh, Ross... that's your m.o. for every candidate: Make them list accomplishments and then discount them because they don't conform to a set of arbitrary standards.
Unanimous bills don't just "happen." Ringo-Barker passed Chelsea's Law (HB 2050?) last session unanimously, but I give those two plenty of credit for making that happen.
I'm not going to discount Avakian's work on a bill because it was too popular. That's crazy talk.
Posted by: DifferentSalemStaffer | Apr 18, 2006 8:27:15 PM
Those [urban planning] experiences will allow him to make a unique contribution in Salem.
Err... what kinds of decisions does everyone think get made in Salem? I think Sam Chase makes a great candidate for Portland City Council, Metro, or Commissioner.
Posted by: Charlie Burr | Apr 18, 2006 8:46:54 PM
It's not just Brad's experience working down in Salem that make him my choice, he's also got a solid record of accomplishments dating back before his years of public service.
A lot of candidates talk about education, but Brad accomplished more than most even before setting foot in the Legislature.
When education cuts eliminated local music and arts programs, Brad helped form the South West Music School, which is open to all children and operates without tax dollars. While working his way through law school, Brad crafted the Juvenile Restitution Program, which trained troubled youth and put them to work, so they could earn money to repay victims of their crimes. When seniors needed help getting their Social Security checks, Brad Avakian was there to volunteer his time through the Senior Law Center. More here.
Having run Charlie Ringo's race against Bill Witt, I've gotten to know Senate District 17 fairly well (but not as well as my good friend Mike Selvaggio). I'd like to see more people like Sam in public life, but Brad's the best fit for this district.
Posted by: Law Prof | Apr 18, 2006 10:25:16 PM
"While working his way through law school, Brad crafted the Juvenile Restitution Program, which trained troubled youth and put them to work, so they could earn money to repay victims of their crimes."
Indeed. Brad Avakian's legal career began even before he graduated from law school. He was (and still is) destined for great things.
Some of Brad's law school classmates are still making noise in local legal and political circles, including:
Eli Stutsman (Death with Dignity Act)
Alan Graf (recently retired(?) from his activist practice)
Bruce McCain (Jeff Merkley's challenger)
Max Williams (former Rep. legislator, now running state prison system)
Brad Avakian should win that race and he will serve his district well, especially as part of the Senate majority.
Post a comment
Posted by: Dustin Buehler | Apr 18, 2006 11:00:17 AM
I am an avid reader of blueoregon.com, but I vowed long ago I would never post. I will make one exception today for a truly exceptional public servant.
I served as Brad Avakian's legislative assistant in the state capitol during the 2003 legislative session. Frankly, I have been accorded no greater honor. Any solidly Democratic legislator will have good votes on a number of issues. Brad is unique not because of his votes -- but because of the *process* he goes through to cast each vote. Brad is a reliably progressive vote (his endorsements from every single progressive advocacy group this election cycle is a testament to that - OLCV, OEA, SEIU, Planned Parenthood, Oregon AFL-CIO, BRO, etc.). But he is not dogmatic. As someone who is both a proud Democrat and also vigilantly suspicious of weak arguments cloaked in partisan clothes, I found this approach refreshing. Brad will always be the consummate example of a public servant who reads the bills and votes the right way after careful thought.
Brad is nothing short of a modern-day Atticus Finch -- a civil rights lawyer who passionately defends just causes. A loving father of two kids (Nathan plays Jem to Claire's Scout!) who always knows that family comes first. And a neighbor respected by all who goes down to the Legislature to serve his community well.
I have heard from others that Sam Chase is a good guy who has done a lot for our community. I truly respect that, and I join others in sincerely applauding his work. However, in this race Sam has the misfortune of running against one of the greatest public servants I have ever had the pleasure of getting to know on a personal and professional basis. The Oregonian said it best in its endorsement for Brad: "In most other legislative contests, Chase would win our endorsement. But Avakian, with his solid record and key experience on the budget-writing Ways and Means Committee, is a keeper in the Legislature."
I urge voters in Senate District 17 to vote for Brad Avakian for state senate. Because I (like others) am annoyed by anonymous posts on blueoregon, I give my email below with the hope that anyone who wants to know more will contact me.
Dustin Buehler
dustinbuehler@yahoo.com