Turns out, Karl Rove was wrong. (Duh.)

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

Well, well, well... Remember this lovely chestnut from Karl Rove - taking a pot shot at Multnomah County?

On Election Day, I remember, in the city of Portland, Multnomah County -- I'm going to mispronounce the name -- but there were four of voting places in the city, for those of you who don't get the ballots, well, we had to put out 100 lawyers that day in Portland, because we had people showing up with library cards, voting at multiple places.

I mean, why was it that those young people showed up at all four places, showing their library card from one library in the Portland area? I mean, there's a problem with this. ... we need to have procedures in place that allow us to monitor it.

And in the city of Portland, we could not monitor. If somebody showed up at one of those four voting locations, we couldn't monitor whether they had already cast their mail-in ballot or not. And we lost the state by 5,000 votes.

Can you identify ALL the errors in those seven sentences?

Nevermind all that, though. The Multnomah County Auditor's Office recently completed an in-depth audit (pdf) of the Multnomah County Elections. What did they find?

The objective of the audit was to determine, through observation and testing, whether Elections has the proper controls in place to ensure an accurate, fair, and efficient election.

A high quality and transparent system for elections is essential for democracy to thrive and for citizens to have faith in their government. Given the high profile concerns about the accuracy and fairness of elections in the United States in recent years and because of their critical importance, we decided to initiate a performance audit of Elections and closely observe the November 2006 General Election.

While we identified some areas for improvement, we found that Elections and its employees conducted the election with honesty and integrity and made strong efforts to ensure that every vote was accurately counted. We were impressed by the ability of Elections to successfully manage all of the complex processes involved in preparing for and conducting an election.

Take that, Karl.

  • (Show?)

    Doesn't surprise me that they didn't find anything wrong. I worked with the folks down there in the 2004 election. Everyone around me did a great job. And it was an insult to all of us who worked our asses off down there to say otherwise.

    But let's see how many inaccuracies we can find...

    • You can only get a ballot in one place in Multnomah County - the county elections office.

    • We have one library card that works at all county libraries. There is nothing on them to say which library you got it at - at least there isn't on mine, my husband's, my sister's, my daughter's...

    • And of course with our computerized system, it's much easier to tell if people have voted multiple times. It's gotten even easier now that we've gone to a statewide registration system. Had someone voted multiples times, it would have shown up as soon as the ballots were scanned into the computer. They'd be flagged before they were ever counted. It's not as if their vote immediately counts after filling it out. The barcode has to be scanned in, signature checked, outer envelope removed, etc.

    • There is a system to monitor things. It's called poll watchers. And the Republicans had plenty of them down there. So many that they had to start rotating people out because there wasn't enough room. They regularly went out of the clearly marked areas and had to be asked to move back into the poll watcher area. I was accused of throwing away ballots by a small group of Republican poll watchers because people would hand me their outer envelope and/or ballot text paperwork to go in the trash when I was working the front door. There was no trash can, so they went into the apron we wore until we could get to a trash can. We ended up moving a trash can near the door, and we'd refuse to take anything from a voter - they had to throw the items away themselves.

    There's my start... anyone else?

  • Samuel John Klein (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Erm...library card? Wha?

    I've lived in Multnomah County continuously since 1992 and not once have I used a library card at any point in the voting process ever. Especially not since it's been mail balloting.

    What is it I'm missing here?

  • East Bank Thom (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Step 1: Congress subpoenas Rove. Step 2: Rove fails to show. Step 3: Congress charges and convicts Rove of inherent contempt. Step 4: Rove spends the next 18 months in jail and i celebrate like there's no yesterday.

    Scheisse, i must be dreaming.

  • Tim Mooney (unverified)
    (Show?)

    If Rove is speaking of the 2004 elections, I was there. And by there I mean Multnomah County Board of elections... the only place one could go to to get a replacement ballot on the day of the election (not one of 4). The library card thing is utter nonsense... is he suggesting they were used for ID? Mail in ballots have an outer envelope that allow the BOE to track whether a person has voted without tracking the actual votes, so multiple voting is not possible the way Rove describes. He could have read this to discover that point, but that would have been an inconvenient bit of fact in the way of his rhetoric.

    So, Rove is making stuff up. Color me shocked.

  • (Show?)

    1)Hen house doors locked? Check. 2)Hen house windows secure? Check. 2)Chicken wire fencing secure? Check.

    Ok, everything looks fine, ya'll can go to bed now.

    Signed, Fox

    Of course ya'll folks would absolutely believe an investigation of the Bush administration by the Bush administration?

    Yip Yip

  • East Bank Thom (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Of course ya'll folks would absolutely believe an investigation of the Bush administration by the Bush administration?

    That's the beauty of inherent contempt. It takes Gonzo and the Department of "Just Us" out of the loop.

  • (Show?)

    Rove's game was far greater than Oregon--"voter fraud" was a coordinated campaign between Rove and the justice department to stymie Dems, disenfranchise Dem voters, and steal elections. It's well-documented (see Talking Points Media), and goes back to pre-White House Texas. It was never a serious allegation; it was, as so many things related to Bush are, a subversion of the democratic process.

  • East Bank Thom (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jeff, it's called vote caging and it's against the law. It may even be a high crime!

  • (Show?)

    Coyote, you're barking up the wrong tree if you're suggesting that the Multnomah County Auditor's office is somehow in the pocket of the elections division just because they both have "Multnomah County" in their titles. The auditor is an independently elected official and the current auditor is a highly qualified professional whose integrity has never been called into question by any credible source.

  • dddave (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I did not see in the report how officials determined whether or not the voters were indeed, US citizens.

    If, as an illegal alien, I have an Oregon Drivers license as Tek K. and the DMV want, and register to vote with a fake or well used SSN, how does the elections division confirm? Do they check for matching name and social? How do they do that?

  • East Bank Thom (unverified)
    (Show?)

    For whatever weaknesses our vote by mail system may have, i think it's overwhelmingly outweighed by its advantages. It can only be the smallest fraction of fraudulent votes slipping through the cracks. Maybe an abusive spouse mandates who votes for what. Or perhaps an illegal alien from Iceland pulls of the perfect crime by getting registered to vote. To a certain extent, bogus votes from disparate voters would tend to cancel each other out anyway. Regardless, all this is outweighed by the increase in voter turnout, presumably leading to a more representative result.

    Friends in my neighborhood have the tradition that come election time, we meet in a pub and bring along our ballots, endorsements from various sources, our individual points of view and a good thirst.

    <h2>Especially with the ballot measures there's sort of a mini round table debate. Minds are changed on occasion. It's amazing how some examples of poorly written initiative split our little group of lefties down the middle. I'm losing faith in the initiative petition process. I might go over to the Sizemore thread and rag on it there. ;-)</h2>

connect with blueoregon