Quick Hits and Deep Thoughts: Home Ownership Edition

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

  • (Show?)

    Contrary to the MSNBC spin, John McCain never said he didn't know how many houses he had. He said he needed to have his staff get back to them on that--and while the audio is garbled somewhat, he mentioned condominium ownership, probably referring to properites that are both rentals and sometime vacation residences, which may or may nor constitute a "home" depending on who you ask.

    Add in the fact that these are basically all owned by his wife--and the fact that she came from a wealthy family has never been a secret--and it is understandable why he didn't want to try to handle the intracacies of this off the cuff.

    I'm sure if anyone had asked John Kerry this question in 2004 (and his wife is even richer than Cindy McCain) he would have been equally stumped on exactly how to answer the question.

  • (Show?)

    That's a very interesting excerpt from National Journal, Kari. I've never heard or seen the New England angle used before and I must confess that I find it both intriguing and compelling.

  • (Show?)

    I had a state politics professor once who liked to group New Hampshire, Vermont, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Oregon, and Washington together -- as having a particular kind of politics.

    To be sure, they all have their idiosyncrasies, but the political culture is underpinned by a progressive, lutheran, sort of good-government kind of thing.

    Note, btw, where National Public Radio is the strongest -- those six states.

    Not sure what it means, but I'm pretty sure it means something.

  • (Show?)

    Jack, the point is: McCain has so much property that he doesn't even keep count, not that he said "well, some of it is in my wife's names, and some of them are condos -- what exactly are you asking?"

    At a time of home foreclosures, and McCain saying that our economy isn't in that bad of shape, it shows him extremely out of touch with the experience of the average American. McCain's campaign has been attacking Obama as elitist, and he has SEVEN homes.

    (Granted, Obama is no average American either, but he only owns one home.)

    To obfuscate with comments about condos and spousal ownership is just that: obfuscation. McCain will hurt middle America because he doesn't understand middle Americans. And has NO authority to call Obama an elitist.

  • (Show?)

    Kari, I'll address your first point.

    The move to rename streets has nothing to do with the asphalt. My personal thoughts are that - and I'm speaking of Cesar Chavez now - some communities are seeking validation from all people, not just their own race or culture. In plain speak, some communities want White people to acknowledge the accomplishments of someone other than Martin Luther King Jr. Every excuse for people to say they address diversity is to play the MLK card (had to use that phrase). We've got the Martin Luther King Jr. Ave., though most of his work was on the other side of the county.

    Chavez did make a significant impact on labor relations even though he only passed through Oregon. We all feel the repercussions though we all do not resemble this late leader. If we had more emphasis on balanced education and sharing all our histories, there may not be such a push to change street names. Heck, new streets may be named after great leaders of every color, not just strange trees or colleges.

    And, I own no homes but I do have a snazzy purple couch with tiger stripes.

  • Rulial (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I'd rather an enterprising reporter ask him a different question, like "If you are against the war, why haven't you done much to try to end it?" I don't really care how many houses Gordon Smith or John McCain own. I take it for granted that people in the U.S. Senate are going to have more money than most people. Being rich is not a disqualification for holding public office.

    However, thinking the economy is hunky-dory when people are hurting shows that Sen. McCain is very out of touch. FDR was also rich but understood the suffering of the common person. That's the comparison I would have liked to have seen in Sen. Obama's ad.

    On the other hand, the response offered by Sen. McCain's spokesperson, in which he indirectly called Sen. Obama "an arugula-eating, pointy headed professor-type", made me incredibly angry. Making fun of someone for dedicating a good deal of his life to thinking and teaching--that's one of the most anti-intellectual things I've heard in a while. A society that endorses that kind of thinking will whither and die.

  • funny (unverified)
    (Show?)

    How many houses does Merkley own Kari? I know of at least two, if you count the one he already has in DC...

  • (Show?)

    Karol --

    The question posed by Mike Burton, which I think is interesting, is not "should we name things after people we want to honor?" but rather "what should we name after people want to honor?"

    Why streets? Over more majestic things found in nature, or more meaningful things like buildings, parks, and plazas?

  • (Show?)

    I know of at least two, if you count the one he already has in DC...

    Yeah, he does own a place in DC - in the Capitol Hill neighborhood; a place where (not too long ago) you dared not venture after dark for fear of getting attacked. That place that he rents for substandard rent to a Lutheran charity... yeah, that place. He's owned it since the 70s.

    Your point?

  • (Show?)

    Oh damn, I should do this again...

    Full disclosure: My firm built Jeff Merkely's website, but I speak only for myself.

  • funny (unverified)
    (Show?)

    He also owns plenty of rental property in Oregon ....and my point is simple: Who cares how many homes Smith owns (which is what you originally asked), and how is that any sort of designation or differentiating factor in who should be our next Senator...there are plenty of other things to discuss other than how many homes someone owns...and trust me, if you think Capitol Hill is anything but posh, you clearly havent been in DC in the last 5-10 years. Many congressmen and senators live on Capitol Hill. As a matter of fact, the only people who "own" property in Capitol Hill are the extremely wealthy. Many of them rent it to interns and entry-level staffers...Come to think of it, not even Gordon Smith owns a home on Capitol Hill.

  • (Show?)

    By the way, there's an error in the National Journal article. I'm quite sure South Dakota had initiative and referendum before us. We had the first measure on the ballot under it, but they passed it before we did (I think they did it in 1898, and we passed it in 1902 or somesuch).

  • Rulial (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Kari, "funny"'s comment shows exactly why bashing Sen. McCain for owning multiple houses is a bad strategy. Jeff Merkeley is known to own several rental properties, but has also shown great concern for the plight of working-class people. (I wouldn't say the speaker is super rich, but he's definitely in better financial shape than many people.) Likewise, John Edwards is wealthy, but has been (until recently) a forceful voice for the poor.

    The problem with Sen. McCain isn't that he's rich, it's that he is so clueless and insensitive he can says things like "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" or that you aren't rich until you have $5 million. And that four more years of Bush-style economic policies would risk bankrupting the country.

  • Rulial (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Argh. Apologies to Speaker Merkley for misspelling his name.

  • funny (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Exactly Rulial....I think comments like Kari's that trivialize Merkley, especially when its coming from someone who is so close to his campaign.

    His differences when it comes to taxes, truly understanding Oregonians and taking a different approach when it comes to the economy, the war and what Oregon needs is what makes Merkley a much better fit for this environment...but to paint him as anything other than a politician (even when its people like Kari or Carla, who technically have no role on the campaign but are clearly close to those pulling the strings) makes him look phoney.

    He is a different politician than Smith, and a better one in my opinion...but he isnt flawless or without his own shortcomings when it comes to politics.

  • (Show?)

    Jack, the point is: McCain has so much property that he doesn't even keep count, not that he said "well, some of it is in my wife's names, and some of them are condos -- what exactly are you asking?"

    Evan, you should review the quote from McCain that is being bandied about in the press. He never says he doesn't know how many homes he owns. He says he's going to let his staff respond to that and then--in a fairly garbled transcript--references condominiums. This isn't obfuscation. It makes it clear he isn't quite sure how to answer that question, which does not suggest to me that he is confused over what he (or his wife) owns but over what counts as a "home."

    There is nothing in what McCain said that indicates he has lost count of how many homes they own and it is shoddy journalism (i.e., the kind MSNBC practices on Republicans and that Fox News practices on Democrats) to suggest otherwise.

    On the bright side, it gave Obama one more opportunity that he is no longer a "new" kind of politician.

  • LT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    OK, Jack, let's drop all the talk of houses. That is, if you can explain to all of us why McCain didn't support the most recent GI Bill. Was it because he and some friends had an alternative which only had about 13 co-sponsors? If that is the truth, why not say so?

    I heard someone from Iraq Afghanistan Veterans of America talking about this legislation on the radio awhile back. Bipartisan support, over 50 co-sponsors incl. 2 former Navy Secretaries.

    If McCain doesn't want to talk about how many houses he owns, can he talk about the substance of his own voting record? Or does he have nothing good to say about himself because he thinks he will win more votes by attacking his opponent?

  • LT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Kari, I'm old enough to have met McCall, Myers and other moderate, common sense Republicans back when that wasn't an oxymoron. I campaigned for McCall's re-election. The difference between McCall and Reagan (neighboring GOP governors) was the difference between Lieberman and Biden or Wyden. You won't get me to oppose Measure 65 with cracks like,

    "If the Oregonian is trying to convince me (and you) to support Measure 65, I'm pretty sure "More Republican Governors" isn't the way to go."

    Jack, you'd have a long way to go to be as much of a common sense moderate as McCall, Clay Myers, the late great Nancy Ryles, the still active Norma Paulus.

  • mlw (unverified)
    (Show?)

    As I recall, his reason for not supporting the new GI Bill was that he believed it was too generous. He thought it would undermine retention in the military by encouraging people to explore other careers outside of the military. In other words, once you're in, you have to stay in forever to deserve good benefits, in his view. As a 14 year veteran of the military, I have to say I was unimpressed by his reasoning.

    On the bigger issue, I thought his comment that you weren't "rich" unless you made $5 mil a year was pretty clueless, but maybe I'm just jealous that I didn't marry a beer heiress after unceremoniously dumping my first wife who stood by me for the 5 years that I was a prisoner of war. For a guy who gets a lot of credit for character, he sure doesn't demonstrate much.

  • JTT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    there's an error in the National Journal article

    Yes, Oregon was the third state to enact the initiative and referendum in 1902 (SD in 1898, UT in 1900)...we were however the first to use it in 1904.

    Back to the topic at hand. McCain's houses are like Gordon Smith's golf clubs. It just shows how out of touch he is. The guy has a lobbyist write his economic and energy plans and has a hard time describing the number of houses he owns. Most Americans count themselves among the lucky if they can say they own 1 home. Especially in this day and age of the economy and housing market. So no you're right "funny"...GS doesn't own property on Capitol Hill...he has a mansion right on the posh fucking golf course. I really don't pity the man and his golf clubs, marble fireplace, and gold course mansion. Let's send him packing for home...the one not in DC that is. Then maybe he'll be able to finally cleanup the environmental "spills" from his food packing plant and "fix" the plant. Hell, he might even have some extra time for golf...

  • edison (unverified)
    (Show?)

    How many homes a candidate owns or how much $$ someone makes to 'qualify' as 'rich' means nothing. What matters is how a candidate represents the people they're elected to serve and, what their past voting record has been. Based on that, neither John McCain nor Gordon Smith represent most voters - instead, they openly represent those who support monetarily their reelection campaigns; think big oil, greedy land developers, etc. Both men are shining examples of how truly disconnected the ruling elites are.

  • (Show?)

    shows exactly why bashing Sen. McCain for owning multiple houses is a bad strategy.

    Who's bashing McCain for owning multiple houses?

    The Obama campaign is hitting McCain for being woefully out of touch with average Americans. With seven houses worth $13 million, and a private jet, it's no wonder that McCain thinks the economy is "strong" and that you have to make $5 million a year to qualify as "rich".

    Did you even watch the ad?

  • Randy2 (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jack Roberts:

    "He never says he doesn't know how many homes he owns. He says he's going to let his staff respond to that..."

    Ah, the time-honored stall-for-time technique because you don't want to blurt out a guess.

    And he has no clue what a home is? Shameless.

    Randy2

  • Steve (unverified)
    (Show?)

    "Jack, you'd have a long way to go to be as much of a common sense moderate as McCall, Clay Myers, the late great Nancy Ryles, the still active Norma Paulus."

    The only reason blues don't dump on these moderates is because they aren't running now.

    And is Norma a Republican? Since when?

  • Vico (unverified)
    (Show?)

    "More Republican governors":

    The sooner Bob Caldwell is put out to pasture, the better for the health of the Oregonian editorial page. It would be astonishing that he has been retained for so long, except that it's the Big O. Please, please, let him go for the buyout.

    So many things wrong with the thinking in this editorial. Would Tom McCall, if he were just beginning in politics today, be a Republican? The underlying notion that the Republican party would not be what it is today if only Democrats could vote Republican in the Oregon primary is laughable. And why would we want Democrats in office who are more moderate than ones in office today? Most of them are Pablum Moderates already.

    Measure 65 is a bad idea that will undermine party cohesion and identification and will lead, yes, to more Republican governors. But they won't be McCalls and Hatfields (at least one of which is pretty seriously overrated by the Caldwells of the world).

    By the way, putting nice guy Atiyeh on the list of Oregon's best governors provides another good laugh. Typical Caldwell.

  • (Show?)
    The Obama campaign is hitting McCain for being woefully out of touch with average Americans. With seven houses worth $13 million, and a private jet, it's no wonder that McCain thinks the economy is "strong" and that you have to make $5 million a year to qualify as "rich".

    You can have money -- lots of it -- and still have a clue about the economic welfare of the average American, if you're willing to pay attention. Simply having a lot of houses doesn't automatically make you 'out of touch.'

    FDR had several residences, in addition to coming from a background of wealth, yet his detractors painted him as a raving socialist. The various Kennedy clan members have all come from similar backgrounds, yet they also have been considered to stand up for the middle class.

    I believe John Kerry was actually far wealthier (by marriage) than John McCain. Theresa Heinz Kerry and he had at least five homes worth nearly $30 million.

    And then there's your boy John Edwards, who just last year was mocked in exactly the same fashion as you mock McCain, simply for having a lot of money. How could he possibly care about the poor since he had all that money?

    But when you start doing that, you lose track of the thread. Money itself doesn't create ignorance about the economic ills of society. Someone making $150,000 a year can be just a clueless about the plight of poor people as someone making $5,000,000. Hell, people making the average household income of about $45,000 can be ignorant about what people living on $20,000 have to do to get by.

    It's not the money. It's whether you try to overcome the gaps in your knowledge. It's understanding that there are things you don't know, and attempting to fill in those holes that's important.

  • (Show?)
    And is Norma a Republican? Since when?

    Since, like, forever. Or at least since she was a state legislator in the '70s.

  • genop (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I think the relevant questions as regards Gordon Smith is not what he owns, but who owns him.

  • Rulial (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Kari, yes I watched the ad. It doesn't come out and say "McCain sucks for owning more houses than he can keep track of", but it definitely implies (as does your comment) that this is why he is out of touch. My point is that I don't actually care WHY he is out of touch. It could be because he owns 400 houses, or because he plays World of Warcraft all day in his parents' basement. Regardless WHY he is out of touch, it's bad for him to BE out of touch. But being rich is not a disqualification for being president, so why even bring it up?

    There's been a lot of talk by right-wingers on this forum about how Democrats hate the rich. I've constantly refuted these attacks (e.g. here), because I strongly believe that Democrats don't hate the rich, and that making people contribute to the stability society in proportion to how much they've benefited from it is an entirely reasonable act and not motivated by jealousy and hatred. But ads like this make that job much, much harder.

  • LT (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Steve, not only was Norma Paulus an unbeatable Republican legislator until she decided to run for statewide office, I suggest you check out who challenged Gordon Smith in the late 1995 US Senate primary to replace Packwood. Perhaps the last really intelligent Republican primary.

    <h2>Maybe she is not your definition of Republican, but back in the days before people yelled RINO and DINO, lots of Republicans were like Norma.</h2>

connect with blueoregon