The parable of the beaver.

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

Entering this year's contest, all the smart people were convinced it would be a blowout. Surely, the scrappy underdog didn't have enough fight to take on the strong favorite.

After all, the favorite was used to winning, had more money and more power, and the well-known national talent. To be sure, the favorite had taken some hits along the way, but they'd always managed to make the right adjustments at the right time to confound their opponents.

And while the commentators acknowledged the theoretical possibilities, they smugly smirked, knowing the underdog just wouldn't be able to compete the whole way. The favorite was just bigger, better funded, and had a long history of winning.

Even the fans of the underdog weren't sure they could win. They'd enjoy the contest, cheer loudly, and celebrate minor victories, but never admit that they, too, shared the skepticism of the smart set.

But on the field of play, the underdog wouldn't be denied. Fighting hard and fighting smart, they executed their game plan with just enough creativity and grit and determination to flummox the favorite.

Scrambling left and scrambling right, the champ was confused about which way to turn. Nothing seemed to work. No matter what they tried, the underdog was there to outmaneuver, outwork, and outperform.

Yes, it's true, the underdog can win. Even when no one believes they can.

If the game plan is smart and everyone does their job, even the champ can lose to the underdog.

  • cw (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Great parable. I can't wait to share this with my 4th grader, who is really into this election, even gets emotional about it. He will love this, and so do I, I am moved...

  • Randle McMurphy (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Don't think this post will prevent me from taunting you about this game for several years.

  • (Show?)

    You turn lemons into lemonade, proud Trojan...

  • (Show?)

    The analogy doesn't really work, because USC didn't give the game away, OS won it. The pattern of this election at this point is that Smith has fallen much further down than Merkley, even while dragging him (Merkley) down as well. Smith's ads have backfired on him, for the most part. And since Merkley's own ads have been generally positive, any attacks on Smith from Democrats that have had an effect have come from Chuck Schumer.

    Kari, are you suggesting the Trojans were simply a sham, an empty team riding on hype? Interesting.

  • Barney (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Wow... thanks TJ. I was lost on this post.

    I just thought that Kari was sucking up to Beaver fans, and that Merkley (sponsor ad) paid him to do it.

    Now I get that #1 USC vs lowly unranked OSU is supposed to some how represent the Oregon US Senate race, Smitty being USC, and OSU being Merkley?

    <h2>Thanks again, TJ, otherwise I never would have got Kari's post. Maybe I should have hit on some of the hyperlinks, but I wasn't in the mood.</h2>

connect with blueoregon