Not Your Grandfather’s Workforce, but It’s Still His Unemployment Insurance System

Chuck Sheketoff

Let’s say you often bike to work and your Oldsmobile stays in the garage half the work week. On a day when you drive, you get into an accident. Although you dutifully pay insurance every month, your claim gets denied. “Sorry,” your insurer says, “you don’t drive enough.”

It’s crazy, right? But that scenario is not too different from what many laid-off Oregon workers experience when attempting to collect unemployment insurance (UI) benefits.

Oregon’s antiquated UI program often excludes part-time and temporary workers whose employers paid into the system on their behalf. Modernizing the program so that it better serves today’s workforce is more urgent today, as a severe recession leaves more Oregonians without work.

UI is good for workers, businesses and employers. The temporary wage benefits help keep the families of laid-off workers afloat. Local merchants are better off when unemployed workers continue spending on housing, groceries and other basic needs. And once business conditions improve, it helps employers call back experienced workers they need.

To be more effective, however, the system must be updated to reflect changes in the workforce. Established in 1935, UI was designed when the labor force mostly consisted of male breadwinners who worked full time. Today’s workplace looks vastly different, with more women, part-time and temporary workers.

Currently, laid-off part-time workers can collect unemployment benefits only if they are willing to accept full-time work. For many, full-time work is not an option — if they are balancing work with caretaking responsibilities, for example.

Part-time workers are a group that is too big to leave out. One in four Oregon workers labors part time, and those workers’ employers pay into the system on their behalf, just as they do for full-time workers.

These and other UI rules shrink the pool of workers covered. Today, only about half of unemployed Oregonians collect UI benefits.

That’s bad news for the 98,300 Oregonians who have lost their job since December of 2007, when the downturn began. According to the latest data from the Oregon Employment Department, state unemployment stands at 12.1 percent, tying the rate in November 1982, the highpoint of Oregon’s early 1980s recession.

Now is a good time for Oregon to upgrade its UI system, not only because of rising unemployment but also because we are getting extra funding to modernize our UI program.

This week Governor Kulongoski signed legislation that will allow us to qualify for the federal funding. The new law changes UI eligibility criteria to allow workers to count more of their recent work experience. T improvement will help workers who recently entered the work force or who work intermittently to qualify for unemployment benefits. Most of those who will benefit are low-wage workers.

Oregon can improve UI further. It can (1) eliminate barriers for part-time workers, (2) allow workers to get their benefits immediately rather than having to wait a week for their first check, (3) boost the benefits for workers who have children to support, and (4) permit low-wage workers to complete a job training program while they collect unemployment benefits. Other states have taken those steps, and so should Oregon.

Just as you don’t drive your grandfather’s Oldsmobile, Oregonians shouldn’t be stuck with their grandfathers’ unemployment insurance system. As noted in an editorial by The Oregonian (PDF), the time to bring Oregon’s UI system to the 21st century is now.


Ocpp_final_1 This column is an updated version of a monthly commentary column distributed to newspapers throughout the state by the Oregon Center for Public Policy this past January. You can sign up to receive email notification of OCPP materials at www.ocpp.org

  • Temp from Chiswick (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Definitely, considering that in the future almost everyone will be a temp.

  • C.R. (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Chuck, as much as I agree with you on most things I have trouble with a characteristic of your arguments that seems to be becoming increasingly common with those of us who are nominally left-of-center. Maybe because those who are right-of-center increasingly do it to. That is mix in fallacious appeals to emotion with genuinely good arguments, thereby reducing the integrity of the argument.

    In this case, it's the old argument whether taxes and public benefits should be used as indirect instruments of social policy. Both sides are happy to do that when they can figure out how to use them for social policies they prefer. The end result, however, is general distrust of government because of a total disregard for fairness and equity.

    The only good argument for fixing our unjust unemployment system is that it is unjust. People should receive benefits in proportion to how their employer paid in and to the work situation they are choosing to look for: If you work part time and your employer paid in on that basis, and you only want to look for part time work, your benefits should be sized according SO LONG AS you demonstrate you are looking for part time work. This unemployment system should not be argued as a way to pump the economy or deliver social services we should be arguing about and for on their own merit.

  • Idaho River Journeys (unverified)
    (Show?)

    C.R., this is still a cut above. Witness the lack of responses, the gold standard for a good article on BO. I can not remember once when a poorly written piece was ignored. Anything that penetrates the veil only seems to produce dazed gawkers.

  • (Show?)

    CR - a person's unemployment insurance benefits are proportional to their earnings...so a part time worker gets less than a full time worker at the same wage level...but the law doesn't allow the part time worker to only look for part time work.

connect with blueoregon