Matinee Lessons from District 9

Jeff Alworth

There's a moment in the recent movie District 9 when the camera stops to regard the city of Johannesburg.  Hanging in the sky is a massive, derelict spaceship, and it is the object of visual splendor to which I believe director Neill Blomkamp was D9directing our attention.  But my eye was drawn to the impressive skyline, terrain I've never seen--familiar in a generic manner, yet unfamiliar in the specifics. 

Humans are by nature local creatures, but Americans even more so; the cities we know and care about are contained within our borders--except, perhaps, those in Europe we use as vacation backdrops.  As my mind tried to take in the size of Johannnesburg, I had a funny sensation, magnified the longer I watched the movie, that a future exists in which the world spends very little time looking at the insignificant skylines of US cities or caring what we do in them.

A more obvious metaphor, I suppose, is District 9's very premise.   A couple decades ago, an alien vessel broke down in earth's atmosphere, stranding millions of aliens who were summarily quarantined by the local government.  A standard Hollywood set-up, except that it's not a Hollywood film.  The aliens aren't being held by malevolent Americans but rather malevolent South Africans who work not for the CIA but a shadowy agency called the MNU; the allegory isn't, say, a strained rendering of a half-remembered chapter about Japanese internments; and the lead is some slightly doofus-y guy who is distinctly not George Clooney.  The movie was made for a paltry $30 million, a sum recouped in the US alone over the weekend (though it received simultaneous international release) as it shot to #1 at the US box.  Another obvious clue that it wasn't an American picture: it was actually entertaining and compelling.

I'm not much of a nationalist, but I felt a twinge of regret watching this import.  Not for any of the obvious reasons.  I hope Hollywood goes bankrupt immediately (yesterday, ideally)--I'd love to see more foreign cities and read subtitles while watching things explode in them.  I would delight in seeing every decent sci-fi script skip the hands of George Lucas and go immediately to Peter Jackson's. I don't mind others exceeding us. (District 9 is admirable, but it's no Matrix.)  I mind that we're getting so much worse than us.

This is not only true in the movies.  Politics lately have become intolerable.  Death panels--really?  We're supposed to nod and consider such asinine nonsense as if it's a credible argument?  Today a gun representative told Chris Matthews that armed men should be allowed to attend presidential town halls and saunter through airports and onto planes.  Seriously. Or take the news.  The arrival of Glenn Beck goes to show the trajectory that's on.  (Connect the dots: Murrow, Cronkite, Jennings, Hannity, Beck ... ?  We don't want to know.)  And the less we say about Big Papi and Brett Favre, erstwhile faves of mine, the better.  Evidence abounds--one not need visit a town hall meeting to wonder if maybe the US needs a breather as the world's foremost power.

Not everything is worse.  TV is enjoying a rennaisance.  (Netflixsters, get your Mad Men, Season 2 disks now!)  In Oregon, we enjoy perhaps a greater abundance and variety of beer than anywhere, anytime.  Our restaurants are lovely, our bike lanes ample. It's just that so much of the really good stuff seems to come from somewhere else.  Not to get too morose about it, but when South Africa can whip up a $30 million blockbuster with effects every bit as good as those rendered at Skywalker Ranch, the writing's on the wall. 

Then again, maybe that's a good thing.  The fewer GI Joe: Rise of the Cobras we have to endure, the better.

  • Boats (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Today a gun representative told Chris Matthews that armed men should be allowed to attend presidential town halls and saunter through airports and onto planes.

    Why not? What's the irrational fear about on this topic?

    You don't take "death panels" seriously? Well gun control is right up there with it as a non-credible policy stance almost totally based upon immature emoting, outright lies, statistical manipulation, closeted racism and class bias, with a heaping of extreme technical incompetence regarding firearms.

    MSNBC: What's a barrel shroud Representative McCarthy? MCCARTHY: It's the shoulder thing that goes up.

    <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9rGpykAX1fo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9rGpykAX1fo&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

  • District 9 (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Part of the plot sounds, well familiar. An alien slave ship crashes in the desert. That's Alien Nation, a movie and (later) TV show from about 20 years ago. But this has a huge twist from Alien Nation. The Newcomers are not assimilated, they are kept in slavery. They look less human. Great idea.

  • Rick Hunter (unverified)
    (Show?)

    You forgot to include Matthews and Olbermann in your list of progression, or trajectory, or whatever. Just because you agree with them doesn't mean they're not completely unhinged.

  • (Show?)

    D9 was as unsubtle an allegory (metaphor?) about apartheid as the makers could manage. it was about 20 years too late, but perhaps meant to warn those in SA who long for the "good old days" how evil their system was. it was also a fun movie. humans & aliens 'sploding like over-tomatoes in a microwave. how is that not fun?

  • (Show?)

    TA, allegory. Metaphor works, but allegory is more precise. Yes, apartheid was present from the opening shot. That was handled differently from Hollywood's treatment, too. Rather than investing the allegorical matter with a kind of mythic quality, the director just left it stand on its own, unadorned. In other words, he trusted the viewer to understand the allegory (easier, perhaps, in this case and in South Africa) without using a bunch of hyped signifiers to highlight that he was REFERENCING SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT, as an American production would have.

  • Boats (unverified)
    (Show?)

    The allegory fails then. The aliens had something desirable that the nasty humans wanted from them.

    The ANC never offered anything more than the opportunity for banana republic ruin.

  • (Show?)

    The Matrix was waaaay overrated. D9 has some structural problems, but seeing it reminded me of watching Alien 30 years ago this summer.

    <h2>Boats, if you think the allegory breaks down because the native South Africans didn't have anything the white settlers wanted, you must have missed the part where they took over their land and used them as a cheap source of labor for a couple of centuries.</h2>

connect with blueoregon