Fritz releases poll with 44-10 lead over Nolan

Kari Chisholm FacebookTwitterWebsite

Well, now this is a bit of a curiosity. It's been an article of faith among the political chattering class in Portland that Rep. Mary Nolan is going to beat Portland City Commissioner Amanda Fritz. The only question was whether it would be in May or November - given the presence of three other candidates on the ballot.

But now, a new poll from Goodwin Simon Research - a firm advising the Fritz campaign - has released topline numbers from a poll of 402 likely primary voters earlier this month. From the polling memo (full pdf here):

In head-to-head competition for Portland City Council, Position One, Amanda Fritz leads Mary Nolan by a 34-point margin, up from a 26-point lead in October 2011, with a total of 44 percent of likely voters saying they would vote for Amanda Fritz and just 10 percent saying they would vote for Mary Nolan. Another 43 percent of likely voters are unsure. The other three candidates on the ballot share less than one percent support among likely voters.

The O's Beth Slovic has the response from the Nolan campaign:

Kristi Jo Miller Lewis, Nolan's campaign manager, said Fritz's poll results don't reflect their own campaign polling. Though she declined to share specific numbers, Miller Lewis said Nolan's results show "we're in a good position." She added that Fritz's campaign contacted a Nolan supporter through the poll, and the supporter told the Nolan campaign that Fritz's questions pushed positive messages about Fritz. Releasing the results showed that "Fritz is pretty desperate," Miller Lewis said.

Of course, campaigns only release polls when they're favorable, so apply a few grains of salt to the Fritz numbers. But the lack of competing numbers from Nolan seems to suggest that they haven't seen the opposite.

Now, it's certainly true that neither campaign has started airing TV ads - and Nolan has some $170,000 on hand while Fritz has just $42,000, according to the O. But that seems like a tall hill to climb.

What do you think? Is the conventional wisdom - a big Nolan win - just flat out wrong? Or just premature?

Whom do you support? And why?

  • (Show?)

    Not sure where these polling numbers come from but Mary Nolan for sure!

  • (Show?)

    I believed those numbers a lot more after seeing Nolan's response. Sounds like they have her behind too, just not by as much. The CW is definitely with a Nolan win, but on the other hand incumbency argues for Fritz.

  • (Show?)

    I have known Mary Nolan since her time at the City. I find her grasp of issues facing the City in line with my beliefs of where our City should head to into the future. We as a City are still facing tough economic times. We need a leader, like Mary Nolan, with vision and knowledge on our City Council.

  • (Show?)

    Mary Nolan is one of the sharpest, hardest-working leaders I've ever met, and I'm excited to see what she will do as a member of the Portland City council. She has been a pioneer for progressive causes and issues in Oregon, both here in Portland, and in Salem, as a legislator. Few people running for office anywhere come as qualified and informed as Mary Nolan. I'm looking forward to voting for her.

  • (Show?)

    Nolan has proven herself in Salem and I can't wait to see her in city hall. She has my vote.

  • (Show?)

    Nolan has my vote. Mary stood with us in solidarity in our battle for the Domestic Partnership Law and has championed LGBT rights for as long as I can remember.

  • (Show?)

    I support Mary Nolan. Beyond all the the points made previously, we need advocates at City Hall who are willing to negotiate with other commissioners to get progressive work done.

  • (Show?)

    I support Mary Nolan because of her long record as an accomplished progressive advocate.

  • (Show?)

    I would be shocked if the majority of the poll respondents knew who Mary Nolan was or even if they know either of them. My guess is the poll identified one as the experienced city council woman and the other as a challenger. Portlanders are not so anti-incumbent as elsewhere in the country. So the polling was done with no voter knowledge of the choice at hand and it proves very little.

  • (Show?)

    Seems that while Rep. Nolan has a lot of friends here, she'll need to spend that money quickly to introduce herself to the city's electorate at-large.

  • (Show?)

    Any poll is a snapshot, at best. Mary Nolan has earned endorsements from groups and individuals who have worked with her for years and know that she delivers, such as Portland Firefighters Association Local 43, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 48, Oregon AFSCME Local 189, Planned Parenthood PAC of Oregon, and NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon. I support Mary because she gets things done for issues important to me and Portland's future.

  • (Show?)

    Has any campaign's publicly-released internal poll not shown a favorable result for its candidate? Unless they release the full methodology, there's no point in taking those numbers at face value.

    • (Show?)

      Yeah, I've seen a campaign release a "not yet, striking distance" internal poll.

      But to your bigger point... Unless there's a specific reason to distrust a pollsters numbers, I think one has to assume they are being truthful about the numbers they got. The core brand for a pollster is accuracy.

      Certainly, Goodwin Simon is a respected polling firm. I have no reason to believe there's anything amiss in terms of methodology.

      Of course, they wouldn't have released it if it wasn't favorable. So there's some bias there, if one was trying to assemble polls into a pattern. But there's just one here.

      As Bunster noted above, Nolan's response lends credence to the poll.

      • (Show?)

        Yes, though I intentionally said "favorable result" rather than "in the lead". There's times when being only 5 points down or something is a favorable result.

        I'm sure they arrived at those numbers somehow, I'm not suggesting they're just made up. That said, a few assumptions about who is a "likely" voter can have a big impact on the results. That's also assuming it wasn't a push poll, like the Nolan campaign alleges, and which there's no way to tell since there's no methodology included with the results.

        I should also note that I say this all impartially, I have yet to pay any real attention to the race or choose a candidate. I just question whether it's really newsworthy when a campaign throws out some numbers like these without any evidence.

        • (Show?)

          There's no way it was a push poll. If it were, hundreds of people would be reporting that they were "polled". And a push poll would never be reported, because the results wouldn't be tabulated.

          A push poll isn't a poll at all - just a message delivery call disguised as a poll.

          And no respectable pollster would have anything to do with a push poll.

          Now, if you're saying they might have done message testing to get the results they're sharing, well, that's more plausible. An ethical pollster would reveal that, however, and Goodwin Simon is a prominent well-known firm.

          Furthermore, if it was wildly out of whack with Nolan's topline numbers, Team Nolan would have said so.

  • (Show?)

    Fritz and Nolan will be debating at the City Club on March 30th if you are interested in hearing from the candidates live. You can reserve tickets here: http://pdxcityclub.org/content/city-council-debate.

  • (Show?)

    It's just a snapshot. No money has been spent. I suspect those numbers will move.

  • (Show?)

    I will vote for Nolan. She's articulate and a true progressive. She's also tough enough to navigate the political landscape of City Hall.

  • (Show?)

    I find it very, very odd that this is at least the second poll Fritz has released. And yet, she has no money to speak of.

    So maybe her numbers are accurate, but what kind of campaign will she be able to run when she has few resources and is spending it foolishly?

    • (Show?)

      It appears that Fritz has announced she has limited donations to something like $50 per donor. Take a look at Nolan's C and E report, and you see the difference in campaign finance philosophy.

      • (Show?)

        If she has, she should be publicizing it as a major component of her campaign. Money in politics is a pretty hot issue right now.

        Our Dem candidate from HD 52, Peter Nordbye, is the only candidate in the state for any office at any level who is refusing PAC money. Further he is limiting donations to $50 per human being. Said human beings must reside in HD-52 and are also the only ones from whom he accepts endorsements. Makes for a steep hill to climb.

        www.neighborsfornordbye.com. Go have a look, but please don't send money unless you live in the district. He'll have to return it.

        • (Show?)

          He is to be congratulated on its principles. There is so much Republican money in the district that such principles will not win the election.

        • (Show?)

          As a college advisor told me, it's nice to be right, but it's more fun to win.

          More importantly, the purpose of politics is to change policy. If you don't win, you can't change anything.

  • (Show?)

    She has some of my money. And gosh she has pluck.

    Calhoun is right; it's a measure of name-recognition (aka thousands of hours of WORK Amanda's done over the past four years to hold the doors of City Hall open for citizens).

  • (Show?)

    Nolan is by far the most qualified.

  • (Show?)

    Maybe these poll numbers reflect some sort of "sympathy for the underdog" effect since Fritz doesn't have Nolan's financial resources or the backing of a lot of well-known organizations. People might be thinking "Poor Amanda, trying to be a good Commissioner and not taking big contributions and the well-connected Nolan is trying to use big money and influence to run roughshod over her." Nolan may want to watch how she's appearing to the general electorate, not just to activists and organization heads. BTW, I haven't made up my mind yet.

  • (Show?)

    The comments that Nolan is a true progressive are kind of funny as if Fritz is some type of Tea Party candidate.

    Fritz has, in my opinion, often been the lone voice of sanity, in a otherwise chamber of insanity.

  • (Show?)

    Isn't there an element in Portland who can remember the very close recent election on public financing, which is how Fritz got elected in the first place? The power of citywide name familiarity will play a role, as the early polls indicate. However, polls at this time, when an opposing candidate is well-financed and has a lot of labor and business support, can be quite misleading. It will come down to the quality of Nolan's advertising and how much work she gets done on the street. Highest number of highest quality contacts win -- at least they do in a City of Portland race. Fritz does not have a high number of negatives with voters, like say a Frank Ivancie did. Don't think there is time for an opponent to build them credibly in the primary, so attack advertising is probably not going to work.
    This is a very interesting race. Fritz has to hope she can win in the primary. Nolan has to push her to the general to win.

connect with blueoregon