Jimmy Carter says... Run, Al, Run!

Former President Jimmy Carter makes his presidential preference known - and makes a compelling case for why Al Gore should run for the White House. Apparently, he's also been calling Al to urge him to run. A lot.

Meanwhile, Think Progress has all the video of Al Gore at the Oscars last night.

Discuss.

  • (Show?)

    I have to say I really enjoyed the gag speech Gore begin to give at the end of the first presentation with Leonardo DiCaprio. Given the fact he was so stiff in personality seven years ago, he really pulled it off and got the laughs.

    But seriously, the guy needs to get in the race and kick Hillary's butt.

    Kudos to Carter for putting pressure on Gore, I hope he continues to call for him to run.

  • (Show?)

    I got a kick out of the little comedy bit too. Well done.

  • THE WOLFE (unverified)
    (Show?)

    The Political Process is a soul crushing experience riddled with tens of thousands of back stabbing heartless douche bags and if you're really great at your job only your family and 50% of the country will hate you.

    The problem with America is that most good people figure this out...and unfortunately for us Al Gore has too.

  • (Show?)

    GOOD FOR CARTER. RUN AL RUN! (No offense, john edwards, still my strong second choice)

  • Garrett (unverified)
    (Show?)

    That's why it is considered public service. It's not supposed to be easy being the President.

    Al Gore would do great. I wish he would run. He might be hiding out in his lair waiting for 2012 though. I think there isn't any doubt that there are at least 2 formidable Republican candidates in Guiliani and McCain and maybe Gore just doesn't think 2008 is a Dem. year. Just a thought.

  • spicey (unverified)
    (Show?)

    if 2008 isn't a Dem year, I don't know what is. ya gotta be kidding. 2008 is going to be a huge win for the Dems. Unless Bush & Co. pull out of Iraq tomorrow, they are so done, like leaving your chicken on the grill too long. burnt chicken meat. bye bye Bush & Co. for a good long long long time.

  • Larry (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I wonder if Gore will get the "Bono treatment" now that it's been revealed the former vice president uses way more energy himself at home than the average American.

    According to a think tank in Gore's home state:

    "The average household in America consumes 10,656 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, according to the Department of Energy. In 2006, Gore devoured nearly 221,000 kWh—more than 20 times the national average.

    "Last August alone, Gore burned through 22,619 kWh—guzzling more than twice the electricity in one month than an average American family uses in an entire year. As a result of his energy consumption, Gore’s average monthly electric bill topped $1,359.

    "Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore’s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006.

    "Gore’s extravagant energy use does not stop at his electric bill. Natural gas bills for Gore’s mansion and guest house averaged $1,080 per month last year."

  • JMG (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Gore-Spitzer '08!

  • engineer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Larry, it would be interesting to know what the energy consumption of Al's Hollywood sycophants is. No doubt it is higher than the "average" citizen's. Reminds me of the former Soviet Union, where the elite lived high off the hog while espousing the glories of socialism to the masses...

  • (Show?)

    I think the vanishing point for Al to announce is quickly approaching, but maybe the love he got last night will make him reconsider. Run Al, Run!

  • (Show?)

    And I'm sure that Al Gore's house and other buildings that use that electricity/gas are also quite a bit larger than the average person's.

    Does he have a farm, business, etc. on the premises? Are there multiple buildings?

    You can't compare to the "average American" without giving some info on the location being discussed. Because the average American is probably only in about 1,000 square feet of house. I'm sure he has a lot more than that.

  • engineer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jenni, with all due respect, you just dont get it do you?

  • (Show?)

    Hey, if the Oscars and the 2006 World Cup can buy enough credits to be "carbon neutral," I'm sure Al and Tipper's homelife can be accommodated too.

  • (Show?)

    Yes, I do get it. People around here like to compare apples to tractors, and then charge those of us who ask for the facts surrounding the comparison of "not getting it." It's a pretty common theme.

    As someone who has been involved in the environmental movement since I was about 10 years old, I definitely get it.

    Obviously my electric bill here in Oregon where I need no a/c in the summer, can use the fireplace in the winter, has city sewer/water, and have a little over 1,000 sq feet is going to use a heck of a lot less energy than someone who has 6,000 square feet, needs the a/c to keep cool during the summer, runs a farm, uses a pump for water, etc. Not that the description I just gave is Gore's house. That's why I am saying that we need to know the facts surrounding the comparison.

    Anyone can compare two things. It doesn't mean the comparison is correct or even means anything.

  • C Burr (unverified)
    (Show?)

    I know that's it's the season to focus on strategy, electability, horse-racey blah blah type stuff, but on the most fundamental question -- who would make the best President -- Gore's clearly the strongest. I may like others in the race, but Gore's really in a league of his own. No one can match his experience, command of policy, and leadership on our most important issues.

    If Gore gets in, everything changes -- and he'd have my total, absolute support.

  • C Burr (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Also, please consider this comment today's PSA to not feed the trolls.

  • (Show?)

    C Burr--

    I agree with you completely.

    At that point it'd be a matter of who do we support as a vice presidential candidate.

    I can only hope Hillary would get the hint and decide not to run if Gore throws his name in.

  • Larry (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Jenni, doesn't the following paragraph warrant at least a tic on your hypocrisy meter?

    "Since the release of An Inconvenient Truth, Gore’s energy consumption has increased from an average of 16,200 kWh per month in 2005, to 18,400 kWh per month in 2006."

    And also, why are the Gores living in a mansion with just two people anyway? Isn't there just a little bit of wasted space and excess energy consumption going on here? Why not a state-of-the-art ultra-green eco-roofed high-density condo development instead?

    Is the message the environmental movement really wants to send to, yes, "average Americans," something like "It's OK to be wasteful and extravagent as long as you are super rich"?

  • Grant Schott (unverified)
    (Show?)

    In 2000, I didn't think much of Gore, who I saw as an opportunist and a flip flopper, and I supported Bill Bradely. I am far more impressed with him now, especially after seeing him in PDX in late '05 doing his Global Warming presentation. His humor and sincerity were evident then, as they were last night. If only he could always be that relaxed on camera. I am currently for Joe Biden, but Gore's record and experience are far greater than that of any candidate (except for perhaps Biden or Richardson... minus being VP). If Hillary and Obama kill each other off like Dean and Gephardt did last time, I hope that Gore steps in.

  • (Show?)

    Gore does indeed use his home more than most people. when Bill Bradbury went to Tennessee to learn how to deliver a version of AIT, along with over 100 over notables (including Faith Hill, who i already loved for singing the song at the very end of "Mad About You", one of my favorites shows of all time), the training took place at his home. i believe in the horse barn, which obviously has been modified for more than horsies.

    these "energy" attacks on Gore are going to prove as bogus as all the other attacks run against him. he's being tremendously effective, and his success will lead to changes in how people purchase energy and appliances, how they live their lives, and the nature of their politics. he's not merely inconvenient; he's downright dangerous. so the wingnuts will find and use anything they can to try and destroy him. what we cannot forget is that his message is scientifically sound and that what he is preaching is true: we either change the way we live, or we risk our entire future.

  • (Show?)

    i think Gore will pass for several reasons. one, he's been down that road and he doesn't want to go thru all that shit again. he was treated more unfairly than any person i can think of by the media, and that includes poor dead Anna Nicole. second, i think his friendship with Clinton would keep him from challenging Hillary (the same reason we see nothing of Clark). but most importantly, he has power and clout to effect climate change that would evaporate in the heat of politics. Kitz has made that decision regarding the Senate: he knows he'd beat Smith, but being a senator would reduce his ability to affect health care the way he desires by about 90%. Gore probably believes that whoever the Dems run will win (he's right). and he has enough confidence in Hillary and the rest to serve well. so why should he go thru that again? after all, he's already won once before; he's got nothing left to prove.

  • engineer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Mr Burr said "Also, please consider this comment today's PSA to not feed the trolls."

    Why do you characterize posters who respectfully disagree with a point-of-view you happen to hold "feeding the trolls"? Whatever happened to the free exchange of opinions (again, done without name calling)? Is every poster on this blog supposed to agree with your views, hold hands and sing kumbaya?

  • faolan (unverified)
    (Show?)

    'engineer' he's saying that because you are not, in fact, being respectful when you disagree. Every poster on this blog is not supposed to agree with anyone. Lord knows progressives are not capable of that sort of focus. But when you say things like;

    "Jenni, with all due respect, you just dont get it do you?"

    You are not being respectful. As a matter of fact you are being insultive. Then when she asks you to back your statements up with facts you offer misleading ones with no basis of comparison. Until you can offer substantive facts with corroborating evidence you have no business speculating on ANYONE's power usage, much less President Gore's.

  • (Show?)

    much less President Gore's.

    Hey, you're not prophetic, are you? Cause if so, you just made my day.

  • (Show?)

    Has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?

  • faolan (unverified)
    (Show?)

    No, no prophecy. Just recognizing history.

    Al Gore was elected to be President of the United States of America in November of 2000.

    He is the President that I recognize not the pretender that sleeps in the White House currently.

    That one I only refer to as Mr. Bush, and I give him the Mr. grudgingly.

  • (Show?)

    With "all due respect" to those that are besmirching Gore for his power usage, I quote today's comments in the Center for American Progress daily email "The Progress Report".

    ATTACKING GORE: The right wing is angry that Gore has won so much public attention and goodwill for his work on global warming. Determined to smear his efforts, influential Internet gossip Matt Drudge yesterday published details of Gore's electricity bills under the screaming headline: "Gore Mansion Uses 20x Average Household; Consumption Increase After 'Truth.'" (Drudge's attack comes two weeks after Fox News host Sean Hannity accused Gore of hypocrisy for taking a private jet to President Clinton's State of the Union in 2000, and a year after "a seemingly amateurish Youtube video mocking the 'An Inconvenient Truth' turned out to have been produced by slick...public relations firm called DCI, which just happens to have oil giant Exxon as a client.") Gore rebutted Drudge's recent attack, pointing out 1) that his family has taken numerous steps to reduce the carbon footprint of their private residence, including signing up for 100 percent green power through Green Power Switch, installing solar panels, and using compact fluorescent bulbs and other energy saving technology; and 2) Gore has consistently purchased carbon offsets to make up the family’s carbon footprint -- a concept the right-wing fails to understand. These are the lengths that climate skeptics must go to suppress action on global warming. There is no meaningful debate within the scientific community, so the right-wing busies itself with talk about Gore’s electricity bill -- and even then it distorts the truth.

    Learn more about this right wing slur on Gore here.

  • engineer (unverified)
    (Show?)

    Setting aside for a moment all the political discussion centered around AG, and assuming the figures about AG's energy use are accurate, aren't you AG apologists the least bit disturbed about the apparent hypocrisy? This isnt a question about right wingnuts or left wingnuts-this is a question about sustaninable living and honesty. Try to be intellectually honest and get beyond whether or not you think AG should or shouldnt be president.
    What I'm reading between the lines in this discussion is that since AG is viewed as the "savior" for combating climate change, we should look the other way for his excesses. A case of the end justifies the means.

  • (Show?)

    I hope Al runs. Without a Nader like candidate to spoil the election, and with the current mood of the electorate, he would win easily.

  • (Show?)

    Everyone who wishes that Al Gore would get into the race should read this column by Joe Conason over on salon.com today. Deeply sad, but undeniably true.

  • GT (unverified)
    (Show?)
    <h2>These self-important and condescending liberals need to be sent to Iraq and blown up. I am completely fed up with their gloom and doom, complete hypocricy and utter contempt for the will of the people. All they care about is themselves and their sense of pride. They want all of us to live in squalor while they live in their golden palaces, use tons of energy and fly in jets all over the world to talk about this made up fantasy called "Global Warming"? Weren't they crying the end of the world was coming back in the 70's but the fad then was a fear of a new ice age?? I hope Al Gore doesn't run for President. We may as well just give up our sovereignty completely and become the next U.N. lackey state. Just what I want to do, pay for yet another governmental bureaucracy's operating costs.</h2>
in the news 2007

connect with blueoregon