I totally supported 3-372, and I'm furious and ashamed with my county for being so shortsighted and selfish. As if the two counties don't ALREADY cooperate with each other, to a far greater tune than $22mil. What if Portland Fire stopped giving mutual aid when Clackamas Fire is otherwise engaged?

But there are two points in this piece that are a little head scratching. The MN bridge collapsed due to a design failure, not disrepair or neglect. And I think rather than a vocal minority, 63% seems quiet but awfully majoritarian. It will be interesting to see the locality breakouts when available.

$5 says that these same anti-tax crowd will whine and cry when this bridge collapses. Not if. WHEN.

And personally? I think that a lawsuit on behalf of those who are injured, killed, and financially disadvantaged by the collapse of the bridge directed at the people who gathered money to stop this project. If I physically blocked repair crews from getting at the bridge and thus caused an accident, I would be liable. Why should they not be?

What comes next? Scale down the project. There's an overly expensive interchange planned for the west side, and the bridge itself is far too wide -- 12 foot sidewalks on each side. Probably a stealth way to push through a four-lane bridge while pretending it's only two lanes.

Redesign it for a narrower bridge and a simpler interchange and see how much it costs.

Or, keep the existing overbuilt plan and toll $1 per car to cross. And exempt vehicles registered in Multnomah County from the toll (probably using some kind of electronic license plate reader) because they're already paying $19 a year for their share of the bridge.

3 readers like this

I would like to find a way to go to work on the slogan the no vote used, which even my very moderate-to-uninvolved son thought was a terrible slogan: "Good neighbors build their own bridges."

I don't know what fantasy world this comes from, if the world had actually relied on that slogan there wouldn't be a bridge existing in the world. And even in the tea partier's fantasy world, the good neighbors would build their own bridge -- and then not let you use it.

Good neighbors talk to you about the problem, and try to make a deal that serves both of your interests -- i.e. you both need to get across the river sometimes. And that's what Multnomah did with us in Clackamas, and gave us a pretty favorable deal.

The vote to me is pretty clear, Clackamas is 49-51% Republican at the best of times, and it's so spread out that people in Mollala and Canby and Beavercreek can think they have no connection with the bridge, so we lost some poverty-fearing otherwise progressive and moderate votes in those areas. And then the accidents of geography, both ends of the bridge are in a southern extension of M. County, but that's actually south of parts of C. County in a northward extension that are tied to the bridge -- my own area, Johnson Creek & 82nd. So that accident of geography lost us a couple of percent of people like Ms. Rigutto.

Again, the good news is that 37% of Clackamas County does understand how and why to vote in more progressive direction.

I wish I could be doing more to organize in C. County than honking and waving when find myself passing the peace vigil near Oak Grove Fred Meyer Saturdays at noon ... we busy people need to ask ourselves to get the job done.

1reader likes this

I want to thank everyone that participated in this conversation. There is a lot to talk about on this important issue, and I'm glad we could start the discussion right here. I also appreciate that people have volunteered potential solutions instead of just railing against those who voted one way or another.

I'm not a transportation expert and I'm not sure what's the next best step, but I think it may indeed come from the list of options here. I'll take a long look and do some thinking on the matter. I do know, however, that the bridge is not safe and that needs to be at the forefront of our minds as we consider timetables, etc.

Clackamas Co. voters are idiots and irrational! That's the meaning we can draw from this. And that irrationality is represented in some of the viewpoints here. Personally I like Carla's suggestion. It's a teaching moment for the irrational talking points. Don't like the bridge, don't want to pay for it? Don't use it!

...Why is anybody shocked, Emerson over at @OregonEconomics called it with the free rider problem diagnosis. That paired with the simple fact that Clackamas county wouldn't mind, personally not professionally, if the Columbia were to suddenly claim the whole of Multnomah county.... They don't like you, and they never will, deal with it.

1reader likes this

I voted to support the registration fee. I had a lawnsign in support - until it was ripped off, not an unusual event here. Why did it lose big time?

• People do not like taxes and fees. People in Clackamas County like taxes and fees less than the average amount for Oregon.

• Tea party flavored anti-government fervor is fairly high in Clackamas County. Ignorant, selfish, uninformed, somewhat racist - yes. Unwilling to get politically active - no.

• There has always been a strong "not Portland" attitude in Clackamas County. We have less money, less power, less sophistication, less education, and more connection to the pioneering spirit.

• There is strong dislike in Clackamas County for spending on non-auto transportation infrastructure. Bicyles and light rail are as popular as colonoscopy. Multnomah County and Portand put much emphasis on non-auto infrastructure. Clackamas County residents notice that and do not want to support it.

• A new fee for a project outside Clackamas County, one so unprecedented that it requires new authorizing state legislation, will DEFINITELY arouse opposition. If there was some other way that Clackamas County could have contributed to the Sellwood Bridge project, then the county commissioners screwed up royally.

The timing of the measure was foolish. People did not move to Clackamas because they're looking for more taxes, and a bigger bridge to encourage Clackamas to export its dollars to Multnomah County and Portland faster, instead of keeping money closer at home and supporting local businesses is a bad idea at any time.

With Lake Oswego and Portland developers plundering the pockets of the Multnomah County taxpayers to build the Trolly To Nowhere, Clackamas voters looked at the bridge From Portland, To Portland, and said what anyone with any sense would say.

Give Sellwood to Clackamas and it would pass. But, since 90% of the bridge trips start or end in Multnomah County, it is unquestionably a Multnomah County responsibility, as enshrined in Oregon law.

I have an overly simplistic opinion about the vote. Good public policy and doing things for the common good which are we concepts have been replaced by "how does it benefit me?" and the quasi-anarchist concept of "government is the problem" which are me concepts.

We made the United States the greatest country on Earth. Me has begun to reverse the process.